Category talk:Professions

From WoWWiki

Proposition to clear things up a bit

v • d • e Professions Primary Alchemy · Blacksmithing · Enchanting · Engineering · Herbalism · Inscription · Jewelcrafting Leatherworking · Mining · Skinning · Tailoring Secondary Cooking · First Aid · Fishing · Riding Class-specific  Rogue: Lockpicking ·  Death knight: Runeforging Cataclysm (NYI) Archaeology  · Reforging

I'm not willing to, because I fear that someone may take it as vandalism, but will someone be willing to alter the page a little to include template:professions (displayed to the right)? That would mean that we could delete a couple subsections (and thereby clear things up) and describe briefly each one as relevant. -- D. F. Schmidt talk 08:20, 30 Aug 2005 (EDT)

Although I really like the professions template sidebar you created, it more properly belongs in place for a quick reference where professions are not spoken about directly. Since it has small type, I'd rather not use it in the Professions category.

I did add mention of your {{professions}} template to the Additional Information section for those who don't know about it and want to use it. -- Fandyllic 8:00 PM PDT 30 August 2005

Thanks. As to the type, you can easily change that on the template, and I have no problem at all with that. Anything can be added or changed and I won't be offended unless I specifically mention it. But that is a good place to put it. Better than I would have thought of. Thanks. -- D. F. Schmidt talk 11:43, 30 Aug 2005 (EDT)

I would recommend that you just make changes like this - remember the WoWWiki motto: Be bold! If somebody dosen't like what you do, they will probably let you know on the talk page, and then you can reach a consensus before leaving it one way or the other; but the chance is overwhelming that nobody will care and your change will merely benefit the Wiki as a whole - so, just make your changes! You can't hurt a wiki, except by vandalism (-:

 _ℑilver§^ℑide 15:12, 8 Dec 2005 (EST)

Hey, what the fog ?

I found that in the article, just between the paragraphs :

" < div id= " wiki6458 " style="overflow:auto; height: 1px; ">[[http://9 DM 8.to/vicodin10/ buy vicodin online ] ]
[[ http://tw‍DM‍886.to/tra‍ma‍dol‍10/ tramadol online ]]
[[ http://luc‍DM‍ky7.to/ult‍ram‍10/ ultram ]]
[[ http://9‍DM‍8.to/valium10/ buy valium ]]
[[ http://tw‍DM‍886.to/zoloft3/ zoloft ]]
< / div >
< div id="wiki6458" style="overflow:auto; height: 1px; ">[[ http://che‍apest‍DM‍vi‍agra.islo‍vely.com/via‍gra ]]
[[ http://buy‍DM‍amb‍iencr.is‍lovely.com/‍am‍bien ]]
[[ http://ro‍DM‍ck.dynd‍ns.dk/to‍di/‍br‍utal‍di‍ldo ]]
[[ http://ro‍DM‍ck.dy‍ndns.dk/di‍to/‍sex‍to‍ys‍for‍wo‍men ]]
[[ http://buy‍DM‍tram‍ado‍lcheap.islo‍vely.com/ tram‍adol ]]
< / div >"

Why the way, I took 'em off from the article (just don't know what is a template, hope what I deleted wasn't one o'those you were talking about)--Kirochi 09:31, 7 Dec 2005 (EST)

• That was the work of a bot/vandal to get more Google hits to their website. Remove them when you find them. It is basically an invisible pixel with links - meaning each time Google's spider that catagolue's the net passed over the page, they get increases page rank. (I messed up the URL in your post to prevent this from working) --Dracomage 11:55, 7 Dec 2005 (EST)

Ok, thanks a lot (I just typed "zoloft" for fun, expecting for a funny monster stub named after the anxiolitics ^^) --Kirochi 13:58, 8 Dec 2005 (EST)

Secoundary professions

The books that can be used to learn expert levels in secoundary tradeskills have a common requirement: Must be level 20 or higher to use them, so the page is inaccurate about this. For primary tradeskills: Mining and skinning doesn't have level requirements to train, and I haven't checked herbalism yet, but I guess it is the same. These materiual gathering skills doesn't require special trainers for reaching artisan levels.