m (clean up, Replaced: {{tooltip → {{{{{tpl|tooltip}}}, using AWB) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Forumheader|Wowpedia policy}} |
||
| − | {{Stub/Item}} |
||
| + | <!-- Please put your content under this paragraph. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> |
||
| − | <onlyinclude>{{{{{tpl|tooltip}}} |
||
| − | |mode={{{mode|}}} |
||
| − | |arg={{{arg|}}} |
||
| − | |name=Glyph of Hemorrhage |
||
| − | |quality=Common |
||
| − | |icon=INV_Glyph_MajorRogue |
||
| − | |stack=20 |
||
| − | |glyph=Major |
||
| − | |classes=Rogue |
||
| − | |level=30 |
||
| − | |effect=Use: Increases the damage bonus against targets afflicted by Hemorrhage by 40%. |
||
| − | |ilvl=35 |
||
| − | |sell={{cost||37|50}} |
||
| − | }}</onlyinclude> |
||
| + | I propose the idea to add into policy that, when a speculation or note section states that the article in question is a reference to something, it should be accompanied with a link to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Wikipedia] whenever possible to sate the curiosity of the reader. |
||
| − | == Source == |
||
| + | --[[User:TherasTaneel|TherasTaneel]] ([[User talk:TherasTaneel|talk]]) 03:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | This item is created with [[Inscription]] (400). |
||
| + | :Often times it is, I'm not sure a policy is needed for that though. {{User:Coobra/Sig4}} 04:57, 9 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| + | ::I know it make common sense, but for some reason easily forgotten. [[User:TherasTaneel|TherasTaneel]] ([[User talk:TherasTaneel|talk]]) 11:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | {{Itembox|Materials needed |
||
| + | :::Suggest it to people who aren't doing it.--{{User:Sandwichman2448/Sig}} 16:48, 9 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | |q1=1|item1=Ink of the Sea |
||
| + | :You'd like to create a policy based on a personal preference. What would this accomplish? It's not like banning non-complying contributors is an option here. I doubt anyone would revert edits adding such links, so it does not seem like a policy change would do much. |
||
| − | |q2=1|item2=Resilient Parchment |
||
| + | :You may consider adding a note to the [[Wowpedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]], but to me it'd fall into the general idea of "Use your better judgement to improve the article" — [[User:Foxlit|foxlit]] ([[User talk:Starlightblunder|talk]]) 17:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | }} |
||
| + | :Just a guideline, a suggestion to improve, I agree that it falls into common improvement of articles, if stated some people who would otherwise forget how, would now have one more tool. But guess I'll take Sandwichman2448 idea would suffice. Never intended it to be a stern look but a helping hand. [[User:TherasTaneel|TherasTaneel]] ([[User talk:TherasTaneel|talk]]) 17:53, 9 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| + | ::I'm afraid I don't understand why linking to Wikipedia is at all relevant. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul|talk]]) 18:28, 9 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | == External links == |
||
| − | <!-- Read http://www.wowwiki.com/WoWWiki:External_links before posting your links here. |
||
| − | Links that do not conform to the rules will be DELETED. |
||
| − | Repeat violations may result in a BAN. |
||
| − | Have a nice day. :) --> |
||
| − | {{Elinks-item|42967}} |
||
| − | |||
| − | [[Category:World of Warcraft common items]] |
||
| − | [[Category:World of Warcraft major glyphs]] |
||
| − | [[Category:World of Warcraft rogue glyphs]] |
||
| − | {{DEFAULTSORT:Glyph Of Hemorrhage}} |
||
Revision as of 18:28, 9 July 2011
Forums: Village pump → Speculation references
I propose the idea to add into policy that, when a speculation or note section states that the article in question is a reference to something, it should be accompanied with a link to Wikipedia whenever possible to sate the curiosity of the reader. --TherasTaneel (talk) 03:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Often times it is, I'm not sure a policy is needed for that though.
(Sssss/Slithered) 04:57, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- I know it make common sense, but for some reason easily forgotten. TherasTaneel (talk) 11:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- You'd like to create a policy based on a personal preference. What would this accomplish? It's not like banning non-complying contributors is an option here. I doubt anyone would revert edits adding such links, so it does not seem like a policy change would do much.
- You may consider adding a note to the Manual of Style, but to me it'd fall into the general idea of "Use your better judgement to improve the article" — foxlit (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Just a guideline, a suggestion to improve, I agree that it falls into common improvement of articles, if stated some people who would otherwise forget how, would now have one more tool. But guess I'll take Sandwichman2448 idea would suffice. Never intended it to be a stern look but a helping hand. TherasTaneel (talk) 17:53, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I don't understand why linking to Wikipedia is at all relevant. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 18:28, 9 July 2011 (UTC)