Talk: The 5 Ring

Revision as of 02:53, 21 June 2011

Why are these in the construct category?--Ashbear160 (talk) 01:16, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Because they are in D&D. Cue complaining.--SWM24 48 01:42, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

So they are constructs in D&D but are they in WOW?--Ashbear160 (talk) 01:58, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

There are no Umbral Blots in WoW. If there were, there'd be a full infobox for them instead of a short paragraph. Everything we know about them comes from the RPG. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 02:30, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

ERR, sorry i meant in the entire warcraft series?--Ashbear160 (talk) 02:37, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

What Warcraft umbral blots are and are not is not detailed (to that level). If we don't know, the category could be removed (unnecessary in my opinion, but perhaps it is less headache in the long run). Shadows & Light references other D&D books, but unlike Manual of Monsters Appendix Three: Other Monsters in Warcraft, they are explicitly in the setting, as opposed to them having the potential to be adapted into it.--SWM24 48 02:49, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Yes but are they called constructs in that book? because the description i see here has nothing of construct to it--Ashbear160 (talk) 02:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Sorry if I'm in the wrong here, but isn't the joke ''also'' that neither [[The 3 Ring]] nor [[The 4 Ring]] don't exist? [[User:Lugduname|Lugduname]] ([[User talk:Lugduname|talk]]) 03:25, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
+Why are these in the construct category?--[[User:Ashbear160|Ashbear160]] ([[User talk:Ashbear160|talk]]) 01:16, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
-:I'd say that's the ONLY joke. The "seven ate nine" joke is a play on the fact that "eight" and "ate" are homophones, which isn't the case at all with three, four, or five. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul|talk]]) 17:23, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
+:Because they are in D&D. Cue complaining.--{{User:Sandwichman2448/Sig}} 01:42, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
+::So they are constructs in D&D but are they in WOW?--[[User:Ashbear160|Ashbear160]] ([[User talk:Ashbear160|talk]]) 01:58, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
+:::There are no Umbral Blots in WoW. If there were, there'd be a full infobox for them instead of a short paragraph. Everything we know about them comes from the RPG. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul|talk]]) 02:30, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
+::::ERR, sorry i meant in the entire warcraft series?--[[User:Ashbear160|Ashbear160]] ([[User talk:Ashbear160|talk]]) 02:37, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
+:::::What Warcraft umbral blots are and are not is not detailed (to that level). If we don't know, the category could be removed (unnecessary in my opinion, but perhaps it is less headache in the long run). Shadows & Light references other D&D books, but unlike Manual of Monsters Appendix Three: Other Monsters in Warcraft, they are explicitly in the setting, as opposed to them having the potential to be adapted into it.--{{User:Sandwichman2448/Sig}} 02:49, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
+::::::Yes but are they called constructs in that book? because the description i see here has nothing of construct to it--[[User:Ashbear160|Ashbear160]] ([[User talk:Ashbear160|talk]]) 02:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC)