Sports72Xtrm-gpuser (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
m (moved Talk:Curse of Agony to Talk:Bane of Agony (Cataclysm): Spell rename.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | The damage percentages for the individual ticks appear to be off (they're listed as 57.4%, 100%, 142.59%) |
||
− | {{npcbox |
||
+ | A simple test shows them to be (approx) 72%, 100% and 128.5%. Any one able and willing to confirm/deny? --[[User:GreatLich|GreatLich]] 07:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
− | | image = Ravic.jpg |
||
+ | :From my recollection, the breakdown is much simpler, at least for the basic spell without +spell damage. I restored an older version of the damage-per-tick breakdown (clarified some) which matches my experience. -- [[User:Harveydrone|Har]][[User_talk:Harveydrone|vey]][[Special:Contributions/Harveydrone|drone]] 20:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
− | | name = Ravic |
||
− | | gender = Male |
||
− | | race = High elf |
||
− | | character = |
||
− | | affiliation = [[Quel'Danil Lodge]] |
||
− | | faction = Alliance |
||
− | | occupation = |
||
− | | status = Alive |
||
− | }} |
||
− | {{graphic novel}} |
||
− | |||
− | '''Ravic''' is a [[high elf]] of [[Quel'Danil Lodge]]. He caught [[Lieren]] sneaking into the lodge and confused her with [[Loania]]. He brought her into Loania's room, to discover the real one was just inside. |
||
− | |||
− | He got shocked, and thought Loania had duplicated herself. Shortly thereafter, [[Voldana]] arrived and dispatched him telling him she would handle the situation. |
||
− | |||
− | ==Quotes== |
||
− | *''"Loania?! Why do you dress as a [[wildhammer dwarf|dwarf]]?"'' |
||
− | *''"You're Loania of [[Quel'Danil Lodge|Quel'Danil]]. And you look... bizarre."'' |
||
− | *''Ha! I would not waste my time concocting [[Lieren|a ridiculous version of you]]! Clearly this is your doing, [[Loania]]. Vanity has led you to duplicate yourself!"'' |
||
− | [[Category:High elves]] |
||
− | [[Category:Lore characters]] |
||
− | [[Category:Warcraft: Legends characters]] |
Revision as of 05:59, 24 October 2010
The damage percentages for the individual ticks appear to be off (they're listed as 57.4%, 100%, 142.59%) A simple test shows them to be (approx) 72%, 100% and 128.5%. Any one able and willing to confirm/deny? --GreatLich 07:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)