Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
No edit summary
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
   
 
you'd have to bring it up with adys but my guess would be something to do with [[WW:NPOV]] and maybe some other stuff.{{User:Reskar/Sig}}
 
you'd have to bring it up with adys but my guess would be something to do with [[WW:NPOV]] and maybe some other stuff.{{User:Reskar/Sig}}
  +
  +
: A single person on a single server does not "a great MMORPG moment" make. This would barely be '''acceptable as a server subpage''', let alone as a main namespace page. {{User:Kirkburn/Sig3}} 20:13, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
  +
  +
::Done and donut.--{{User:Sandwichman2448/Sig}} 20:23, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
  +
  +
== Policy conformity ==
  +
  +
Okay, I'll play devil's advocate here... In which way does this page violate policy? For the most part, it seems a factual depiction of events, backed up by evidence. It is written in a ''fairly'' neutral tone, except for possibly "Many people wish to see Rahrum dead" which is a generalization... but again is sort of backed up by the fact that people do tell stories about ganking him.
  +
  +
So.. yeah.. exactly what _is_ our policy, and what are the problems with this article? - Yeah, I do realize it's a very borderline case, but that's why I'd like to talk about it. (Yeah, I personally agree with Kirkburn that it belongs as a realm subpage, not a main namespace one) --[[User:Mikk|<span style="border-bottom: 1px dotted; cursor: help;" title="Mikk is a WoWWiki Admin">Mikk</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Mikk|T]])</small> 05:58, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
  +
  +
:Seems neutral enough for me. I removed the {{t|NPOV}} tag. --[[Image:gengar orange 22x22.png]]&nbsp;[[User:Fandyllic|<span style="border-bottom:1px dotted; cursor:help;" title="Admin">Fandyllic</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Fandyllic|talk]] &middot; [[Special:Contributions/Fandyllic|contr]])</small> 3:57 PM PST 22 Apr 2008

Revision as of 23:57, 22 April 2008

Regarding the Speedy Deletion tag: Um... why? This is similar to great MMORPG moments such as EverQuest's "Page 8" fiasco and WoW's Kralnor. The term is a household name on the Scarlet Crusade server, produced a forum thread that reached the maximum posting count, and spread to many other realm forums and servers.

you'd have to bring it up with adys but my guess would be something to do with WW:NPOV and maybe some other stuff.User:Reskar/Sig

A single person on a single server does not "a great MMORPG moment" make. This would barely be acceptable as a server subpage, let alone as a main namespace page. User:Kirkburn/Sig3 20:13, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
Done and donut.--SWM2448 20:23, 8 May 2007 (EDT)

Policy conformity

Okay, I'll play devil's advocate here... In which way does this page violate policy? For the most part, it seems a factual depiction of events, backed up by evidence. It is written in a fairly neutral tone, except for possibly "Many people wish to see Rahrum dead" which is a generalization... but again is sort of backed up by the fact that people do tell stories about ganking him.

So.. yeah.. exactly what _is_ our policy, and what are the problems with this article? - Yeah, I do realize it's a very borderline case, but that's why I'd like to talk about it. (Yeah, I personally agree with Kirkburn that it belongs as a realm subpage, not a main namespace one) --Mikk (T) 05:58, 12 May 2007 (EDT)

Seems neutral enough for me. I removed the {{NPOV}} tag. --Gengar orange 22x22 Fandyllic (talk · contr) 3:57 PM PST 22 Apr 2008