Quantcast Server talk:Spirestone US - WoWWiki - Your guide to the World of Warcraft
Recent changes Random page
GAMING
Gaming
 
StarCraft Wiki
Super Smash Wiki
Halopedia
Diablo Wiki
FFXIclopedia
Grand Theft Wiki
See more...

Server talk:Spirestone US

From WoWWiki

Jump to: navigation, search

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Server:Spirestone US article.

Please if your going to post guild progression make it nice, or I will be forced to delete it.


The most caring editor - Mailhails. :) 1:15 AM Sept 2cnd

Re-writing Spirestone page

Having not heard from anyone concerning re-editting the page, I will be putting a few new sections in to divide up Horde and Alliance (since there seems to be a bit of contention as to what should be said of each side).

Also, will add a Historical section for information that is out of date. I will not delete any current information, but I believe the guild progression section also needs to be revamped which means some guilds will fall off the list due to inactivity or disbanding.


--Ketta 17:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


Ketta I am re-editting this page to relevant standards, and hitting this page with real truth, Essentially everything has been redone.

guild progression needs a touch up

The guild progression list is out of date and should be updated to show all tracked guilds as listed in the server progression thread by wowzers.

Also there is really no longer a need to list kara progression ( with ZA squeezed in the last frame) and should be removed, unless some one has a good argument for listing 10 man instance progression.

Rocketlawl 07:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


Update:

I made some minor changes to clean up the layout, and updating the guild progression listing to be on par with wowzers guild progression post on our realm forum. I removed the extra progression instance links from title as these links are inside of the guild list title box. I also removoed the kara progression tracking box. individual kara boss kills are not even tracked on our own server thread, I don't think anyone will have a problem with thisbeing taken away =)

Rocketlawl 09:55, 29 January 2008 (UTC)