No NPOV[]
- "Stormreaver EU is a great PvP server with fine balance between Alliance and Horde, Alliance having slight upperhand in terms of population. The Horde and Alliance are nowadays compeleting pretty even in every aspect of PvE. One of the most competitive European realms and a great choice for PvE or PvP oriented player."
Given that there's no official word about server population, and no possible way of comparing two different servers, I don't think the phrasing used is correct. By the way, from the Horde point of view, the server seems rather imbalanced.
--And there never will be an official server population info, given the time Blizzard has had to release that kind of information should have they felt it necessary. http://www.warcraftrealms.com/census.php?serverid=174&factionid=-1&minlevel=60&maxlevel=70&servertypeid=2 shows promising numbers (note; only lvl 60-70 people counted), and even with an error margin of some sort, a "balanced" server should be safe to say (56/44%). Not really an information problem what lvl 60-70 horde people do if they feel unbalance somewhere, is it? ;) --Vel 13:59, 11 February 2007 (EST)
- "Opathy - http://www.opathy.com - International, Pve - Was one of the best guilds, disbanded in September."
- "My Little Pwnie - International, Awesome 6 man guild."
There's no neutrality in either phrase. Also "September" is vague. Finally, if this page is meant to contain disbanded guilds (by the way, Opathy never disbanded), why doesn't it contain other guilds, such as Massive?
--Cba to dig up who edited those there in the first place but they're gone now. Someone feel free to post them back with CORRECT information. --Vel 13:59, 11 February 2007 (EST)
--Anax 12:30, 8 February 2007 (EST)