Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
Advertisement

I think we should move this to "Amphibious" due to "Amphibians" having vertebrates, laying eggs in water, and not being able to breath in water when they are adults. Rolandius Paladin (talk - contr) 02:49, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

"For some reason, this list contains both literal amphibians and creatures that can move both on land and in water in-game." That is what amphibious means. If we had just amphibians, the list would be really short indeed. Also, like I said in one of my edits, the term amphibious is used a lot while amphibian is not used much. Rolandius Paladin (talk - contr) 03:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
The "For some reason..." was rude of me. Frowney Though, the mechanic and the critters seem unequal to me.--SWM2448 04:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
That is okay. I was trying to sort it out myself earlier because the original title of the article was "Amphibian" but then the article had a definition that related to Amphibious creatures. It then said "Examples of amphibious creatures". So if everything was about Amphibious terms, I thought the article should just be changed to Amphibious also. I then looked in the RPG and they used Amphibious a lot also. If we used the term Amphibian, we wouldn't be able to include some entries like Murloc, Makrura, etc. because it looks like Amphibians are only things like frogs, toads, etc. Rolandius Paladin (talk - contr) 04:44, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Advertisement