The damage percentages for the individual ticks appear to be off (they're listed as 57.4%, 100%, 142.59%) A simple test shows them to be (approx) 72%, 100% and 128.5%. Any one able and willing to confirm/deny? --GreatLich 07:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

From my recollection, the breakdown is much simpler, at least for the basic spell without +spell damage. I restored an older version of the damage-per-tick breakdown (clarified some) which matches my experience. -- Harveydrone 20:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)