Talk:Feats of Strength achievements

Does this mean you can no longer gain reputation with the Brood of Nozdormu, the Zandalar Tribe, or the Violet Eye? Xavius, the Satyr Lord (talk) 13:33, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

No. Feats of strength don't have to be impossible. Just highly unlikely come Wrath time. Several (first to 80, Scarab Lord, etc...) will be impossible, though. That's why they're all worth 0 points. --k_d³ 17:13, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

A few of the Feats of Strength now have 10 points assigned to them as of the August 1, 2008 patch release - so the point values are not set in stone yet - and other achievements have changed as well - I just have not gotten to those changes yet. ( Morph | Contribs | Talk ) 08:00, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

---

Every patch brings about a few changes to the Achievements ( additions / removals / renamings / or change in point values ) -- As a result of the continual changes I for now will not be wikifying the pages or listing the list of items/goals that need to be accomplished to get the achievement - I will just be listing the Achievement name and the main discription text of the goal with no sub-listings until the changes slow down a little bit. ( Morph | Contribs | Talk ) 08:00, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

I have updated most all the other achievement pages up to (Beta patch 8905) so now I will start on these - but I just read somewhere that they are going to be removing the "Titles" for the Realm 1^sts to level 80 - 450 profesion skill level in the next patch (or have already done so now) - so I will not be including the Titles for now - ( Morph | Contribs | Talk ) 15:48, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Page update

August 27, 2008 - This page is as complete and as wikified as I can get them for now (beta patch 8820) until the next patch comes out that makes changes to them - ( Morph | Contribs | Talk ) 01:32, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

September 11, 2008 - This page is as complete and as wikified as I can get them for now (beta patch 8926) until the next patch comes out that makes changes to them - ( Morph | Contribs | Talk ) 20:06, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Bloodsails note

What is the purpose of the 'fresh air' comment for the Bloodsail Admiral acheivement? Is it meant to imply the long, long, INCREDIBLY LONG rep grind? KnnOs (talk) 13:42, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

I was wondering the same thing myself - so that could be it - ( Morph | Contribs | Talk ) 16:01, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Feat of Strength Titles

Note that the titles that were associated with level 80 have been removed, but the feats still exist. -Howbizr (talk) 12:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC) Realm First Feats of Strength

First to level 80

I also wanted to post that a French man has already reached level 80. He's been planning it since beta. -Howbizr (talk) 12:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Split into sub-articles

See the new treatment of Dungeons & Raids achievements and discussion at Talk:Dungeons & Raids achievements. This page could really do with being split, but it's not quite so easy, as Blizz have not given us convenient sub-categories. One sub-category that seems fairly obvious to me is "Realm Firsts". Anyone got any suggestions for others? --Murph (talk · contr) 17:38, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

I don't see it needed at all. g0urra[T҂C] 17:49, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough. I'm not going to do it at the moment anyway. I intend to leave the split notice and this discussion open for a few days before any significant changes to this article. --Murph (talk · contr) 17:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Realm Firsts, Mounts, Ranks, Misc. - are some possible Sub-Categories IMO ( but we would have to put a disclaimer letting visitors know that the sub-cats are our doing and not found on the Blizzard UI listing -- ( Morph | Contribs | Talk ) 18:05, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

That was the sort of thing I was thinking about, as a 114 row table is too long if there's some relatively sane ways to split it, IMO. Also, yes, I agree that, if done, there should be a note that it goes beyond the Blizz presentation. --Murph (talk · contr) 18:10, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Formatting maintenance

The maintenance of these types of page is stupid. You have to spend 15 minutes formatting if you add anything low in the alphabet. I went ahead and did the class="alt", but no way I'm renumbering 80 entries by hand. The numbers have no benefit. And we should seriously consider implementing Pcj's automated zebra striping, even if it's kind of buggy. -Howbizr (talk) 18:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Also, what is the point of numbering them? I know at least one is missing,  Brutal Nether Drake Feats of Strength achievement. I don't want to add it because of the stupid numbering. -- Fandyllic (talk · contr) 7:10 PM PST 11 Mar 2009

Because of the Mass amount of entries and / or changes in other achievements that get removed and moved over to the feats of strength section - I do not renumber the current Feats - I just add them to the end - The numbering is just to help with finding them when editing - it is easier to look for ! 23 than to just look thru the mess and try to find the exact wording to make changes to the Feats -- the class="darktable zebra" setting does not work on pages that have breaks in them to make the line ( ie Using ! 23 then on next line put | txt -- the line had to be | 23 || txt for zebra to work ) -- (M o r p hJames E. Rooks, Jr. aka: Morph
Morphgnome & Morphdraenei | ^C | _TLeave me a message on my Discussion/Talk Page) MorphgnomeMorphdraenei 01:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

New Achievements added

I noticed that the Dreadsteed achievement was added for feats of strength. The description is "Completed the Dreadsteed of Xoroth quest." I'm not sure what other classes also get new achievements, possibly Paladins for their mount quest. I didn't make the changes to the page yet. Just wanna get the ok to do so. user:Extremedeath

Achievements #117 thru #125 are the NEW achievements added at the end (the bottom) of the list:

Paladins got #118  [Dreadsteed of Xoroth] and #119 Charger achievements.

Druitds got #120 [Swift Flight Form] achievement.

There are no others at the moment that we know of -- (<span="help title=Morph>M o r p h | <span="help title=Morph_Contribution(s)_to_this_Wiki>^C | <span="help title=Morph_Discussion_Page>_T) <imagelink>IconSmall_Gnome_Male.gif|Gnome|Morphgnome</imagelink><imagelink>IconSmall_Draenei_Male.gif|Draenei|Morphdraenei</imagelink> 17:32, 18 April 2009 (UTC)