m (moved Talk:Icecrown Glacier to Talk:Icecrown) |
N'Nanz@legacy41559967 (talk | contribs) (→Naming: new section) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
There is no implication of an explosion caused by the merge either in the cinematic, nor in the lore that Blizzard has given.[[User:Skreeran|Skreeran]] ([[User talk:Skreeran|talk]]) 03:19, 11 September 2008 (UTC) |
There is no implication of an explosion caused by the merge either in the cinematic, nor in the lore that Blizzard has given.[[User:Skreeran|Skreeran]] ([[User talk:Skreeran|talk]]) 03:19, 11 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Naming == |
||
| + | |||
| + | This zone is known as Icecrown Glacier, not simply Icecrown. --[[User:N'Nanz|N'Nanz]] ([[User talk:N'Nanz|talk]]) 09:29, 11 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 09:29, 11 September 2008
Trees?
This article claims there are only a few stunted trees around the edges of Icecrown, doesn't this contradict the numerous canopy trees seen in TFT?--Mannerheim 08:28, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
I guess, but we'll see with WOTK--Mannerheim 05:47, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
I changed the people and geography to italics because they are being spoken by someone.Krasusinwow (talk) 03:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
The was no explosion at the merging
Fixed the line that said "The merge created such a large explosion that a large portion of the glacier was blown away, leaving a gigantic throne in its place, upon which sits the Lich King."
There is no implication of an explosion caused by the merge either in the cinematic, nor in the lore that Blizzard has given.Skreeran (talk) 03:19, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Naming
This zone is known as Icecrown Glacier, not simply Icecrown. --N'Nanz (talk) 09:29, 11 September 2008 (UTC)