Raw Materials Edit

Perhaps an organization more like this would be less distracting?

For the engineer

• 2x  [King's Amber]
• 20x  [Handful of Cobalt Bolts]
  • ~ 20x  [Cobalt Bar]
• 8x  [Titansteel Bar]
• 2x [Field Repair Bot 74A] (2 sets)
  • 32x  [Thorium Bar]
  • 4x  [Fused Wiring] (one set)
    • 3x  [Delicate Copper Wire]
    • 2x  [Essence of Fire]
• 10x [Field Repair Bot 110G]
  • 16x  [Adamantite Bar]
  • 16x  [Handful of Fel Iron Bolts]
    • 16x  [Fel Iron Bar]
  • 2x  [Khorium Power Core]
    • 2x  [Primal Fire]
    • 6x  [Khorium Bar]
• 20x [Scrapbot Construction Kit] (4 sets)
  • 40x  [Saronite Bar]

Note: This requires creating 2 recipes worth of Field Repair Bot 74A, 2 of Field Repair Bot 110G and 4 of Scrapbot Construction Kit. As bots stack to 20, it may be useful to construct each bot type individually, to require fewer total inventory slots at any one time.

For the Jewelcrafter

• 6x  [Copper Bar]

For the Miner

• (8x Titansteel Bar)
  • 24x  [Titanium Bar] or 48x  [Titanium Ore]
  • 8x  [Eternal Fire]
  • 8x  [Eternal Earth]
  • 8x  [Eternal Shadow]
• (other bars)
  • 12x  [Khorium Ore]
  • 80x  [Saronite Ore]
  • ~30x  [Cobalt Ore]
  • 32x  [Adamantite Ore]
  • 32x  [Fel Iron Ore]
  • 32x  [Thorium Ore]
  • 6x  [Copper Ore]

--Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 21:51, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

I like the hierarchy, but I'm wondering if there's some way to make a collapsible tree control in MediaWiki code? I've seen it done in JavaScript, so it's just a question of whether MediaWiki or a 3rd party extension has packaged it. A quick google turned up this extension: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:TreeAndMenu -- ScratchMonkey (talk) 22:44, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

Maybe there's a way to leverage transclusion for the intermediate parts, so that higher level assemblies can share the trees of lower level assemblies. -- ScratchMonkey (talk) 22:52, April 13, 2010 (UTC)

Just wanted to let you know, Fused Wiring only requires 2 Essence of Fire not 4. I went ahead and changed it above. Besides that I think this setup is a lot better than the one on the page currently, I will switch them out now since it has been a few months since this was posted. -- Drewski4747 (talk) 22:52, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

I think it might just be better to leave a total sum of the basic materials and leave it at that. This particular page is an article and not a guide IMO. -- [[Megawizard (talk) 20:27, October 2, 2010 (EST)

The hierarchy layout is a bit harder to read and follow. The basic materials layout as currently displayed is a lot easier for anyone to look at a glance to see what's needed. Besides, it helps keep consistency throughout the rest of the wiki as the majority of the other recipes are laid out in the non-hierarchy format. SergeantKoopa (talk) 00:37, October 3, 2010 (UTC)