Talk: Lamia

A lot of different things in the Art of WoW have shown up... It's interesting to see if Lamia's will. ~ Lordrayken

Pure speculation on my part, but I think the lamia are the uncorrupted versions of the proud.Tweak the Whacked 05:14, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

How come "some people" got mad when I made some articles from terms in the book, but then Lamia and other articles are okay? I was "told" to add them here instead which is hypocritical. Rolandius (talk - contr) 08:28, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

I believe its cause you didn't just create one or two.... you were giving everything a page... that's when you really started getting all the admins attention. Sssssssssssssssssssssssss For Pony! ^{{TDon't hiss at me.•CIf you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.)} 08:37, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Okay, but does that mean if I had created only one or two of those it would have been okay? Rolandius (talk - contr) 08:42, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Possibly. Sssssssssssssssssssssssss For Pony! ^{{TDon't hiss at me.•CIf you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.)} 08:44, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

I thought it wasn't allowed because of the whole "conceptional" part of it. If so, then Lamia is pretty conceptional also. Rolandius (talk - contr) 10:58, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I'm a D&D fanatic.

OBJECTION! To the thingy in general. Lamia, in first creation, were not lion-centaurs. Rather, while they did have centaurish bodies, Lamia originally had the upper half of a female and would lure the target with charms, drain their wisdom/spirit to lowest poitn, and eat them.--Leo And his beloved lynx, Firestorm 02:17, September 14, 2010 (UTC)