Is it useful at all to keep the section heading numbering matching the level numbers represented? I mean will it be a problem at all if I add an introduction section and then Level 1 becomes section #2?
RE: Cleanup of unused sections: I figured it makes sense to have all levels there so they can be linked to directly. Once you're there you can look a few levels either side for info that might be useful. Alternatively each level section could be completely self contained with all relevant zones and whatnot showing for every level rather than just their starting level.
I really do think that this would work better if each level section was completely self contained. For example at level 16 RFC is available but it is mentioned at level 13 as the first level that it is recommended for. At level 16 you would have to look back 3 levels to notice that RFC had become available. I would prefer for every given level to show all available instances and even go as far as marking them red/yellow/green/grey. One downside is the amount of extra work involved - and repetitive work at that. Also resulting in a much larger document that would possibly need to be broken into 80 individual documents. I'll stick with current plan for now but am open to feedback.
I think this article should expand to include other relevant information related to leveling. I've initiated this by adding the required XP needed for 81, 82, 83 and 84. There is likely other information that could added such as rested XP and so forth. Korval (talk) 05:28, July 19, 2010 (UTC)