Talk: Mekgineer's Chopper

Revision as of 18:51, 25 June 2010

Fall damage

By "this vehicle takes all the fall damage and can be destroyed" does this mean you have to resummon it or that its totaled and have to build another, because frankly that would suck.--Artranian (talk) 14:54, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

As far as I know, it means resummon. Blizzard isn't THAT stupid...I hope. The three-seater mammoth works the same way, I'm told... --Joshmaul (talk) 13:37, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Can anyone explain why [Mechano-Hog] (as of 20-Apr-2009) doesn't say, "and can be destroyed"? I'm gonna fact tag the destroyed part in this article for now. --

Fandyllic (talk · contr) 6:17 PM PST 20 Apr 2009

Rewrite (3/20/09)

I've completely rewritten the pages relevant to the passenger-carrying mammoth mounts and the the Engineering motorcycle mounts to reflect the changes that have been made since the last few patches, as well as debunk some falsities concerning the nature of the mounts and their abilities. These changes have been applied to the following pages:

[Reins of the Traveler's Tundra Mammoth] for the Horde faction.
[Reins of the Traveler's Tundra Mammoth] for the Alliance faction.
[Reins of the Grand Ice Mammoth] for the Horde faction.
[Reins of the Grand Ice Mammoth] for the Alliance faction.
[Reins of the Grand Black War Mammoth] for the Horde faction.
[Reins of the Grand Black War Mammoth] for the Alliance faction.
[Mechano-hog] for the Horde faction.
[Mekgineer's Chopper] for the Alliance faction.

--Yamamoto114 (talk) 00:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Fuel

I have had maybe 30 minutes of game-time on WoW in my life, when my sister let me try out the game for a little bit. I have been studying the game a lot on this Wiki though. However, I really wish to know - what makes the motorcycle run? Without gas stations in Azeroth, how does the motorcycle get fueled? --ENG (talk) 00:28, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

Pyrite. But it can't be cited.

(^Sssss/_Slithered) 01:34, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

It may be phlogiston, but pyrite seems to be what Blizzard is going with in WotLK.--SWM24 48 02:25, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, phlogiston would make more sense.

(^Sssss/_Slithered) 02:45, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

Handwavium. It's a plot device. They don't have to say what the fuel is unless we need to fuel it. One might well ask what powers the Siege Engines... --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 01:14, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

Hmmm, what Does fuel the Siege Engines..? I like to think it's gnomes >:D - Lyco 00:52, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

I assume by that, you mean "puts fuel into the Siege Engines", rather than "is a primary ingredient in the fuel". Gnomes have a low energy-to-weight ratio, and are notoriously hard to process. And we'd like to keep it that way, thank you very much! --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 18:51, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 ::It may be [[phlogiston]], but pyrite seems to be what Blizzard is going with in WotLK.--{{User:Sandwichman2448/Sig}} 02:25, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
 :::Hmm, phlogiston would make more sense. {{User:Coobra/Sig4}} 02:45, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
+::Handwavium.  It's a plot device.  They don't have to say what the fuel is unless we need to fuel it.  One might well ask what powers the Siege Engines...  --[[User:Eirik Ratcatcher|Eirik Ratcatcher]] ([[User talk:Eirik Ratcatcher|talk]]) 01:14, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
+:::Hmmm, what ''Does'' fuel the Siege Engines..? I like to think it's gnomes >:D -<span style="color:green;">''' [[User:Lyco|Lyco]]'''</span> 00:52, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
+::::I assume by that, you mean "puts fuel into the Siege Engines", rather than "is a primary ingredient in the fuel".  Gnomes have a low energy-to-weight ratio, and are notoriously hard to process.  And we'd like to keep it that way, thank you very much! --[[User:Eirik Ratcatcher|Eirik Ratcatcher]] ([[User talk:Eirik Ratcatcher|talk]]) 18:51, June 25, 2010 (UTC)