Gaming
 

Talk:PvP Ladder FAQ

From WoWWiki

Deletion vote

Votes

Delete
  1. Delete Niophe (talk) 19:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC) - (There is no PVP Ladder anymore, and this page was basically a copy/paste job to begin with, so it serves no purpose anymore.)
  2. Delete PcjWoWWiki admin (TDrop me a line!C46,167 contributions and counting) 22:31, 14 November 2008 (UTC) - (the content on the page is duplicated elsewhere)
  3. Delete Image:IconSmall BloodElf Male.gifAMBER(RΘCK) 12:09, 23 August 2009 (UTC) - (WoWWiki is not a copypaste free-for-all bluepost yayforblizzard archive or whatever. Be gone with this and let's have *actual* articles.)
Keep
  1. Keep Image:gengar orange 22x22.png Fandyllic (talk · contr) 3:27 PM PST 14 Nov 2008 - (Added removedfromgame tag. We can keep it for historical purposes.)
  2. keep Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 22:16, September 24, 2009 (UTC) - (I think removedfromgame covers it; we have a history of keeping articles for historical value.)

Comments

  • I would vote to keep except that PcJ mentions that the information is duplicated elsewhere. If someone could link to a page that sufficiently copies this information, I'll vote delete (but I'm too lazy to search for it myself) ;) -- Mordsith - (talk|contr) 20:21, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep voters: that's an entirely different point. This article has not been nominated just a lazy copypaste from an official Blizzard source, for which WoWWiki is not intended. Your arguments would be valid if this deletion tag was slapped onto Honor system (pre-2.0). The original proponent of deletion was mistaken in picking this reason. Besides, a FAQ is not a format really compatible with wikis which thrive to achieve a somewhat encyclopedic level.Image:IconSmall BloodElf Male.gifAMBER(RΘCK) 10:01, September 25, 2009 (UTC)
  • On the other hand, "delete this and bring out a 'real' article" begs for that task to be done first. At which point, Pcj's "this information is duplicated" becomes valid and point-at-able. Currently, nobody has pointed at the page/section that makes this page redundant. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 23:21, September 25, 2009 (UTC)