Talk:Quilboar
From WoWWiki
Organization
Should the Faction section on the button be changed from Nuetral Hostile to Nuetral/Scourge? Considering that a large chunk of quillboar have willingly become undead. Hordesupporter 00:29, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
I don't know why it's "Neutral Hostile" anyway. This terminology is only used in the Warcraft III World Editor, and isn't used in WoW at all. Saimdusan 01:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
"Neutral Hostile" refers to any faction not aligned with either player factions but which is hostile to both. I think it's a good classification. --
V - Talk / Spam
- I disagree, from what I've seen pretty much everywhere else. "Neutral" means neither friendly nor hostile. It seems that "Hostile" is all that's required to mean they're hostile to everybody. -- Harveydrone ( talk | work ) 23:27, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Plural?
Quilboars or quilboar? Is there some sense in which one of these is appropriate but not the other? Eg, "There are three quilboars over there." vs "The quilboar are a noble race." There seems to be some reason to occasionally use "quilboar" as the plural form, but I can't figure out when.
Language
Being that the quilboar are native to Kalimdor, it seems a little silly that they would speak Common or Low-Common. Most likely they would speak Taurahe (because of their close proximity to the tauren) or their own quilboar language; we could call it Pigahe! Pretty much anything would make more sense than them speaking Common, except for maybe Orcish or Ravenspeak. ~ Grudgham (talk) 19:24, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
