Talk:Rogue builds
From WoWWiki
- Past discussions archived to...
- ...Talk:Rogue builds/Archive01 Archived 09:58, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Before editing the Rogue builds page
Please do not remove a spec unless you get the agreement of at least 3 other editors that it should be removed. Do not put non-NPOV comments about builds on the this page either. You may make non-NPOV comments on this talk page an link to them from the article (i.e. [[Talk:Rogue builds#comment about a build|See comment about this build]]. The comment about a build should match the name of the section where the comment lives.). --
Fandyllic (talk · contr) 12:50 PM PST 23 Jan 2008
Contents |
Cleanup
Currently, level 80 builds are being added by everyone and their mother. If there are no objections by 15th of February, I'll do a cleanup and add the generally accepted (tested by ElitistJerks users) builds. Stijnherreman (talk) 10:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- After thinking about it, I'll do the cleanup tonight. Some of the PvE specs on here are just too stupid for words (Vigor, Improved Poisons and Vile Poisons instead of Prey on the Weak, etc). Stijnherreman (talk) 17:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- You can probably do it again, every single build in the unverified part is no match in PvE for the cookiecuttters provided, while the PvP builds are all situational. Refer to http://elitistjerks.com/f78/t37183-pocket_guide_wotlk/ for effective PvE builds (do note the HaT build, only one missing from the list here), which is also the first place to check for new builds in case of patch changes. AsheraKhad (talk) 15:23, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
I moved the Mutilate2 build at the top of the page down to the Cleanup/Unverified section. All the builds at the top of the page were the result of extensive discussion and consensus on the ElitistJerks forums, except for that one, and there is value I think in keeping it that way.Digbong (talk) 19:41, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
I also removed the tail end of a comment that was contextually inaccurate for the build it was referencing (it suggested substituting in a skill that was already present in the build), and that again, did not reflect the PVE discussion on the elitistjerks.com forums. Digbong (talk) 19:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Okay, what the hell?
I'm curious as to who the HELL suggested http://www.wowhead.com/?talent=fGecoe0oV0oZ0xZxbcdhGzdVzh ? Take a look at it. It's TERRIBLE. The moron says it's for PvP, but he doesn't even include Heightened Senses, Master of Deception, Dirty Tricks, Blood Splatter, Fleet Footed, Quick Recovery, or Deadly brew! They specced into Remorseless attacks (Which is only good in a BG, and otherwise ignored) and they specced Ruthlessness (which, although debated, is not the best for PvP when you have other talents available). PLEASE remove this garbage. I suggest something like: http://www.wowhead.com/?talent=fhxbkeMoiMoZZeofdhhddVzc , because the prior build would NOT hold up well in PvP.
Link not working
The link to the WoW community site for this build
(25/46/0) Combat Fist/Sword PvE Raid Spec Instant MH / Deadly OH - Poison focus as Combat (Krizzone of Anub'arak)
is not working. I was just curious what it is.
Draconthir (talk) 16:41, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
