Are we including "named" and "types" in articles? I thought it was only "named" because a creature could have so many "types" that it would fill the page up. Rolandius (talk - contr) 03:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

There are so few both are fine, I guess.--SWM2448 03:31, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh okay. Rolandius (talk - contr) 04:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)