From WoWWiki
I moved old builds here, so no one gets pissed over their stuff being deleted.
Also there is a page with old level 60 builds.
Deletion vote
 |
This article is nominated for deletion!
- A consensus must be reached by voting before any action is taken.
- Please read the deletion policy and check if anything links here before voting.
|
- To vote
- Click [Edit] in the upper-right hand corner of the votes section, and add your vote in one the following methods:
{{vote|Keep|~~~~|optional comment}}
- or
{{vote|Delete|~~~~|optional comment}}
- Then click Save page and you are done!
- Replace
|~~~~| with |sig=~~~~|| if you have a complicated signature!
- To discuss the vote
- Click [Edit] in the upper-right hand corner of the comments section.
|
- The voting process
- See WoWWiki:Policy/Deletion#What to do next for full details.
- Make the following changes based on the outcome:
|
Votes
- Delete
-
- Delete Niophe (talk) 18:02, 13 November 2008 (UTC) - (<This page is useless now, we are past 3.0.2 and nobody will ever use these builds again.>)
- Delete R4ved - (I agree with Nipohe. It pointless to keep outdated information, especially if checking their functionality, usage, and facts isn't possible.)
- Delete Ecozonz ( T • C ) 21:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC) - (Pointless, nobody will ever use these builds again.)
- Delete Dark T Zeratul (talk) 23:24, 5 January 2009 (UTC) - (Echoing the above reasons.)
- Delete Zzzach467 (talk) 06:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC) - (Also agrees with above comments)
- Keep
-
- Keep ~Psychotic~ - (The builds may be out-of-date but since WoWWiki is the leading site in World of Warcraft information, I believe it would be best to leave them for historic purposes. I have found myself looking at older builds just to see the differences (especially since I started playing during 2.4.2). The only problem I see with these pages is that any links to a Talent Calculator will obviously be dead, because Wowhead and the official Talent Calculators would have been updated.)
- Keep ~Meatshield~ (talk) 00:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC) - (agree with Psychotic)
- Keep Smurdah (talk) 06:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC) - (Also agree with ~Psychotic~)
- Keep Primo Dang (talk) 00:16, 2 July 2009 (UTC) - (There's no harm in leaving this page for historical reasons, is there?)
- Keep Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 22:11, September 24, 2009 (UTC) - (We have evidence of people actually looking at this information, invalidating the nominator's reasoning)
Comments