Wikia

WoWWiki

Talk:Warrior builds/Pre 3.0.2

101,775pages on
this wiki

Back to page | < Talk:Warrior builds

I moved old builds here, so no one gets pissed over their stuff being deleted. Also there is a page with old level 60 builds.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zumu (talk · contr).

Deletion vote Edit

VotesEdit

Delete
  1. Delete Niophe (talk) 18:02, 13 November 2008 (UTC) - (<This page is useless now, we are past 3.0.2 and nobody will ever use these builds again.>)
  2. Delete R4ved - (I agree with Nipohe. It pointless to keep outdated information, especially if checking their functionality, usage, and facts isn't possible.)
  3. Delete Ecozonz ( T C ) 21:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC) - (Pointless, nobody will ever use these builds again.)
  4. Delete Dark T Zeratul (talk) 23:24, 5 January 2009 (UTC) - (Echoing the above reasons.)
  5. Delete Zzzach467 (talk) 06:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC) - (Also agrees with above comments)
  6. Delete TeeSon5 (talk) 22:59, November 18, 2009 (UTC) - (Well, here's how I view old builds. First of all, if you're going to make a page that says [Class Builds for patch (patch name)] ... I think it mine as well be deleted on the spot. It will become out of date in absolutely no time at all because Blizzard keeps updating their stuff. However, for historical purposes; I have a different view. My first view on historical purposes is that they are pretty useless. I don't see the point of "reviewing" out of date builds. Another point of view I have is that I respect other people for wanting to look as old builds for whatever reason. Thats why I think there should be a specific page (or section on the specific class location) that has some old builds on it. Nevertheless, I vote for the deletion.)
Keep
  1. Keep ~Psychotic~ - (The builds may be out-of-date but since WoWWiki is the leading site in World of Warcraft information, I believe it would be best to leave them for historic purposes. I have found myself looking at older builds just to see the differences (especially since I started playing during 2.4.2). The only problem I see with these pages is that any links to a Talent Calculator will obviously be dead, because Wowhead and the official Talent Calculators would have been updated.)
  2. Keep ~Meatshield~ (talk) 00:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC) - (agree with Psychotic)
  3. Keep Smurdah (talk) 06:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC) - (Also agree with ~Psychotic~)
  4. Keep Primo Dang (talk) 00:16, 2 July 2009 (UTC) - (There's no harm in leaving this page for historical reasons, is there?)
  5. Keep Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 22:11, September 24, 2009 (UTC) - (We have evidence of people actually looking at this information, invalidating the nominator's reasoning)
  6. Keep SWM2448 20:54, November 22, 2009 (UTC) - (Historical reasons.)
  7. Keep Vonjin71 (talk) 20:18, December 23, 2009 (UTC) - (See above)
  8. Keep Cindrah (talk) 22:08, January 15, 2010 (UTC) - (Agreed.)
  9. Keep PcjWoWWiki admin (TDrop me a line!C62,301 contributions and counting) 02:49, January 24, 2010 (UTC) - (no comment)

CommentsEdit


Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki