No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | The Druid must have one more stance, Cat Form - Prowl, corresponding to a rogue's Stealth being a stance. [[User:Madkaugh|Madkaugh]] ([[User talk:Madkaugh|talk]]) 02:38, 28 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
| − | {{npcbox |
||
| + | : Nope. for macros use [stealth] [[User:Cowlinator|Cowlinator]] ([[User talk:Cowlinator|talk]]) |
||
| − | | image = Humanmale nopic.jpg |
||
| − | | name = Tammis Foxton |
||
| − | | gender = Male |
||
| − | | race = Human |
||
| − | | affiliation = [[Alliance]] |
||
| − | | faction = Alliance |
||
| − | | occupation = Blackmoore's personal servant |
||
| − | | relatives = [[Taretha Foxton]] (daughter), [[Clannia Foxton]] (wife), [[Faralyn Foxton]] (son), [[Thrall]] (surrogate son)}} |
||
| + | Can anyone confirm/update plz if warlocks demon form is considered a stance for macros? [[User:Cowlinator|Cowlinator]] ([[User talk:Cowlinator|talk]]) 02:23, 26 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
| − | {{Novel}} |
||
| + | : fixed [[User:Cowlinator|Cowlinator]] ([[User talk:Cowlinator|talk]]) |
||
| − | '''Tammis Foxton''' was [[Aedelas Blackmoore]]'s personal servant. He was with Aedalas when they both discovered [[Thrall]], and was promoted when he forced his wife [[Clannia Foxton|Clannia]] to become the little baby [[orc]]'s wet nurse. He is also [[Taretha Foxton|Taretha]] and [[Faralyn Foxton|Faralyn]]'s father. |
||
| + | == Death Knight == |
||
| − | [[Category:Humans|Foxton, Tammis]] |
||
| + | I can find no evidence anywhere that DK presences are treated like stances by the game, or where 1=blood 2=frost etc came from. The [stance] macro conditional does not seem to work with presences at all. --[[User:Cowlinator|Cowlinator]] ([[User talk:Cowlinator|talk]]) 08:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | [[Category:Lore characters|Foxton, Tammis]] |
||
| + | |||
| − | [[Category:Warcraft: Lord of the Clans characters]] |
||
| + | :They worked for me. {{User:Jormungand01/sig}} 17:41, 16 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | ::Dang, I swear I tested it and it didn't work. Don't I feel dumb now... -[[User:Cowlinator|Cowlinator]] ([[User talk:Cowlinator|talk]]) 00:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :::I have tested it just now, and stance conditionals (other than [nostance] which appears to always be true for Death Knights) do not work for Death Knight presences. Can someone else test it, and if you have a macro that works using a [stance:x] conditional, post that macro here? Otherwise I'll check back in a week or so and delete the Death Knight column. -[[User:Nandini|Nandini]] ([[User talk:Nandini|talk]]) 05:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | ::::They do not work for the [stance] conditional in macros. Don't understand why not, seems rather biased against DKs to limit that ability. I only found this out as i was helping a friend warrior work on his macros and expected to be able to test the logic for him on my DK. --{{User:Zealvurte/Sig2}} 13:19, 7 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Hunter and paladin? == |
||
| + | |||
| + | A hunter's Aspects and a paladin's Auras don't count as stances? --[[User:Azaram|Azaram]] ([[User talk:Azaram|talk]]) 05:07, 6 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :Hunter's Aspects don't appear on the special stances bar, so they don't count as stances. I'm not sure about paladin Auras, but if they appear on that bar then by all means put them in. <span style="background:#000000; border:1px solid #AAAAAA; line padding:2px; margin-left:4px; font-size:85%;">'''[[User:Jormungand01|<span style="color:#CC0000; cursor:help" title="sss..."> Jormungand01 </span>]][[Image:IconSmall_Rogue.gif]]'''</span><span style="background:#222222; border:1px solid #666666; border-left:0px; padding:1px; margin-right:6px; font-size:85%;"> [[User talk:Jormungand01|<font color="#CCCCCC">talk</font>]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jormungand01|<font color="#CCCCCC">contribs</font>]] </span> 09:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | ::I dunno, I don't use a standard UI, so I don't even know what the bar would look like... I was asking, not complaining. --[[User:Azaram|Azaram]] ([[User talk:Azaram|talk]]) 11:49, 7 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :::Paladin auras are definitively not stances, even though they appear on the "Special Action Bar". Whether or not a spell appears on this bar has no direct relationship to whether a stance is associated with that spell. -[[User:Nandini|Nandini]] ([[User talk:Nandini|talk]]) 06:19, 2 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | Hunter aspects now seem to appear on the Stance Bar. Has anyone figured out numbers yet? --[[User:Webfox|Webfox]] ([[User talk:Webfox|talk]]) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :They're still not stances, so they still have no numbers. [[User:Inien|Inien]] ([[User talk:Inien|talk]]) 00:38, October 27, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Minor Edits == |
||
| + | |||
| + | Changed "In macros and the Bongos add-on" to "In macros and some action bar add-ons" since Bongos is out of date and shouldn't really be specifically mentioned. Also changed the location of the threat link, since it seems customary to link the first instance of the word. -[[User:BrknSoul|BrknSoul]] ([[User talk:BrknSoul|talk]]) 01:01, 17 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 00:38, 27 October 2010
The Druid must have one more stance, Cat Form - Prowl, corresponding to a rogue's Stealth being a stance. Madkaugh (talk) 02:38, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Nope. for macros use [stealth] Cowlinator (talk)
Can anyone confirm/update plz if warlocks demon form is considered a stance for macros? Cowlinator (talk) 02:23, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- fixed Cowlinator (talk)
Death Knight
I can find no evidence anywhere that DK presences are treated like stances by the game, or where 1=blood 2=frost etc came from. The [stance] macro conditional does not seem to work with presences at all. --Cowlinator (talk) 08:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- They worked for me. User:Jormungand01/sig 17:41, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Dang, I swear I tested it and it didn't work. Don't I feel dumb now... -Cowlinator (talk) 00:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- I have tested it just now, and stance conditionals (other than [nostance] which appears to always be true for Death Knights) do not work for Death Knight presences. Can someone else test it, and if you have a macro that works using a [stance:x] conditional, post that macro here? Otherwise I'll check back in a week or so and delete the Death Knight column. -Nandini (talk) 05:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- They do not work for the [stance] conditional in macros. Don't understand why not, seems rather biased against DKs to limit that ability. I only found this out as i was helping a friend warrior work on his macros and expected to be able to test the logic for him on my DK. -- Zeal (T/C) 13:19, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Hunter and paladin?
A hunter's Aspects and a paladin's Auras don't count as stances? --Azaram (talk) 05:07, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Hunter's Aspects don't appear on the special stances bar, so they don't count as stances. I'm not sure about paladin Auras, but if they appear on that bar then by all means put them in. Jormungand01
talk · contribs 09:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Paladin auras are definitively not stances, even though they appear on the "Special Action Bar". Whether or not a spell appears on this bar has no direct relationship to whether a stance is associated with that spell. -Nandini (talk) 06:19, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Hunter aspects now seem to appear on the Stance Bar. Has anyone figured out numbers yet? --Webfox (talk)
- They're still not stances, so they still have no numbers. Inien (talk) 00:38, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
Minor Edits
Changed "In macros and the Bongos add-on" to "In macros and some action bar add-ons" since Bongos is out of date and shouldn't really be specifically mentioned. Also changed the location of the threat link, since it seems customary to link the first instance of the word. -BrknSoul (talk) 01:01, 17 May 2009 (UTC)