Template talk:Outdated

From WoWWiki

New version

just a proposal, and i dunno if you saw my i-note test template or not. but how about this?

Warning: This section contains information that is out dated.

I don't really see the point in adding may or article(especially this, as it's an inline template, not for use on whole articles, just sections). --Zealtalkcontrweb 08:22, 23 January 2007 (EST)

Sure, changed.--Hobinheim (talk · contr) 09:55, 23 January 2007 (EST)

Broken?

When I add the OOD tag to a section, it will not allow it to be on its own line. See Blacksmithing proficiencies. RobertM525 04:01, 8 March 2007 (EST)

Radical Changes

Good point - tweaked. Note that this design also has a reason input. Kirkburn  talk  contr 18:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Problem with reason and elinks

{{OOD|There are 55 librams now and only 37 listed. See [http://www.wowhead.com/?items=4.7&filter=ub=2;ma=1 wowhead] for a complete list.}}

Yields

This article or section contains information that is out-of-date. Please replace the old information with up to date information. This may include rewriting sections to ensure they are clear and concise, and wikifying.

But just remove the elink, and it's fine.. I really don't know why that is.

{{OOD|There are 55 librams now and only 37 listed. See wowhead for a complete list.}}

Yields

This article or section contains information that is out-of-date. Please replace the old information with up to date information. This may include rewriting sections to ensure they are clear and concise, and wikifying. Reason: There are 55 librams now and only 37 listed. See wowhead for a complete list.

Probably a simple fix I'm just not seeing. Can anyone help? Thanks!  Howbizr^(t·c) 4:48 PM, 9 Jun 2009 (EDT)