Ashbear1603980@legacy41525370 (talk | contribs) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
::They're all listed in Eternals. --{{User:Pcj/sig}} 19:51, June 5, 2010 (UTC) |
::They're all listed in Eternals. --{{User:Pcj/sig}} 19:51, June 5, 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::You still didn't say a thing about my suggestion...--[[User:Ashbear160|Ashbear160]] ([[User talk:Ashbear160|talk]]) 21:14, June 5, 2010 (UTC) |
:::You still didn't say a thing about my suggestion...--[[User:Ashbear160|Ashbear160]] ([[User talk:Ashbear160|talk]]) 21:14, June 5, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | ::::I said the template is fine the way it is. --{{User:Pcj/sig}} 21:21, June 5, 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 21:21, 5 June 2010
Archive: Template talk:Species/Archive1, Template talk:Species/Archive2
Simplification
This template was becoming ridiculous. I have removed all of the subspecies and split off the detailed links to the various categories. For instance, the Azeroth natives have {{Azeroth natives}} while the aliens have {{Azeroth aliens}}. This should make this template much easier to use and to maintain. As such, I am unprotecting it. Don't over-complicate it again. Thanks. --Pcj (T•C) 04:03, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah it was and this is somewhat a good idea, anyway i added gnomes and relinked native to azeroth and alien to azeroth to the templates you made above, but could you make templates for the other type too plz?
- Sapient Dragonkin,Sapient titanic creations and sapient demons and fel corrupted species
- I think it would be best if we divide demons template into Demon section and fel corrupted section--Ashbear160 (talk) 13:32, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- {{Dragonkin}}, {{Titans}}, {{Burning Legion}} already existed and were already in use. --Pcj (T•C) 13:39, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- But those have other thing in the mix and contain non-sapient species :S, those are more about factions than the sapient races :S--Ashbear160 (talk) 14:00, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- {{Dragonkin}}, {{Titans}}, {{Burning Legion}} already existed and were already in use. --Pcj (T•C) 13:39, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- And i can't add evolutions of the titans creations and it has warlocks and normal blood elves in the mix, and stupid species-
- And it lacks information i can't add to those templates :S--Ashbear160 (talk) 14:04, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Because the titan one is specificity for titanic creations and not it's evolution making some things disappear like kvaldir and sand gnomes, in the burning legion template contains normal species that are not sapient demons stupid animal demons and then divides things into major and lesser races separating sub-species from main species like gan'arg and Moarg, can't add void gods since they are not part of the burning legion,dragonkin also has many stupid races, and we already have one template for also the burning legion template you showed is a factional template like a horde or alliance template and not a sapient demons and fel-corrupted species template--Ashbear160 (talk) 14:24, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- also the creature template has it's own subcategory and isn't linked to burning legion section, actually now that i think about it could be changed to work like the mounts and creatures template--Ashbear160 (talk) 14:24, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Why did you undo?--Ashbear160 (talk) 19:14, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Why did you change it to link to the templates when the pages it was linked to were already suitable? --Pcj (T•C) 19:15, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Err no they are not suitable Titanic creations is a incomplete page and nature is a schools of magic, and doesn't exactly have any race connected to it, and it's better if we link all of them to templates like native to azeroth and alien to azeroth--Ashbear160 (talk) 19:18, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- How is an incomplete page worse than linking to a template? --Pcj (T•C) 19:19, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Because the template is a breakway from the original template, i still think this template should go the direction mounts and creature type templates took, it would solve our problems--Ashbear160 (talk) 19:23, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- How is an incomplete page worse than linking to a template? --Pcj (T•C) 19:19, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Err no they are not suitable Titanic creations is a incomplete page and nature is a schools of magic, and doesn't exactly have any race connected to it, and it's better if we link all of them to templates like native to azeroth and alien to azeroth--Ashbear160 (talk) 19:18, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Why did you change it to link to the templates when the pages it was linked to were already suitable? --Pcj (T•C) 19:15, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Why did you undo?--Ashbear160 (talk) 19:14, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Then some don't have articles, and what do you think of my suggestion to diverge it like creature and mount template--Ashbear160 (talk) 19:37, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, its preferable to link pages over templates but since those don't have pages (yet) it doesn't matter for those so much...I think it's fine the way it is now. --Pcj (T•C) 19:38, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Could you give your opinion on the suggestion?, also it makes the ancients and elementals and angels unrepresented in the category--Ashbear160 (talk) 19:42, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, its preferable to link pages over templates but since those don't have pages (yet) it doesn't matter for those so much...I think it's fine the way it is now. --Pcj (T•C) 19:38, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Nature since it doesn't link anywhere--Ashbear160 (talk) 19:50, June 5, 2010 (UTC)