Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
(bot; splitting tree/tier in {{Infobox talent}})
 
(Created page with "{{Forumheader|Wowpedia general}} <!-- Please put your content under this paragraph. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> {{Proposal}} I propose we remove the "...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
{{Forumheader|Wowpedia general}}
{{Removedwithcataclysm|patch=4.0.1}}
 
  +
<!-- Please put your content under this paragraph. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
<onlyinclude>{{Infobox talent
 
|name=Improved Soul Leech
 
|image=Ability warlock improvedsoulleech
 
|description=Your Soul Leech effect also restores mana to you and your summoned demon equal to X% of maximum mana, and has a Y% chance to grant up to 10 party or raid members mana regeneration equal to 1% of maximum mana per 5 sec. Lasts for 15 sec.
 
|class=Warlock
 
|tree=Destruction
 
|tier=8.6
 
|affects=[[Soul Leech]]
 
|ranks=2
 
|talent_req=[[Soul Leech]]
 
|buff_name=Replenishment
 
|buff_type=Magic
 
|buff_image=Spell_Magic_ManaGain
 
|buff_desc=Replenishes 1% of maximum mana per 5 sec.
 
|buff_dur=15 seconds
 
|doc=
 
}}</onlyinclude>
 
   
  +
{{Proposal}}
'''Improved Soul Leech''' is a talent in the [[destruction]] tree, you will need to spend 40 points in destruction to max it.
 
  +
I propose we remove the "Quest:" prefix from quest pages for consistency. Standard disambiguation naming can apply for any collisions. I raised the point in IRC but found no good reason why we keep it this way. So I want to get others' opinions on this. --{{User:Pcj/sig}} 16:30, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
   
  +
{{Vote/Vote}} <!-- Possible tags: Vote/Vote Vote/Closing Accepted Declined -->
== Rank table ==
 
  +
===Votes===
{| class="darktable zebra" style="text-align: center;"
 
  +
<div style="margin-left: 0.5em;">
|-
 
  +
;<span style="color:#44CC44;">Yes</span>: <!-- Add: {{vote|Yes|~~ ~~|optional comment}} below (remove space between "~ ~")-->
! Rank !! Mana restored !! Proc chance
 
  +
{{vote|Yes|sig={{User:Pcj/sig}} 16:30, 16 April 2011 (UTC)||Nominated}}
|-
 
| 1 || 1% || 50%
 
|-
 
| 2 || 2% || 100%
 
|}
 
   
  +
;<span style="color:#CC4444;">No</span>: <!-- Add: {{vote|No|~~ ~~|optional comment}} below (remove space between "~ ~")-->
== Notes ==
 
As a Destruction Warlock, the only real way to quickly regenerate mana is with [[Life Tap]]. Improved Soul Leech adds a bit more mana that isn't tied into burning health away to get more mana. Keep in mind that this talent also gives your pet mana. Since Destruction Warlocks tend to use the Imp, which has a tendency to run out of mana, this talent allows the Warlock to keep the pet's [[DPS]] potential at its highest. Thanks to the [[Replenishment]] effect, this talent is very useful for raiding.
 
   
  +
</div>
== Patch changes ==
 
  +
=== Comments ===
* {{Patch 3.1.0|note=Now has a 50/100% chance to proc [[Replenishment]].}}
 
  +
<div style="margin-left: 0.5em;">
* {{Patch 3.0.2|note=Added.}}
 
  +
<!-- Add :your comments <nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki> below -->
  +
</div>
  +
<hr style="color: #555;" />
   
== External links ==
 
<!-- Read http://www.wowpedia.org/Wowpedia:External_links before posting your links here.
 
Links that do not conform to the rules will be DELETED.
 
Repeat violations may result in a BAN.
 
Have a nice day. :) -->
 
{{Elinks-spell|54117}}
 
   
  +
{{classfooter|Warlock}}
 
  +
<!-- END OF VOTING BOOTH AND COMMENTS -->

Revision as of 16:30, 16 April 2011

Forums: Village pump → Remove quest prefix from quest pages

I propose we remove the "Quest:" prefix from quest pages for consistency. Standard disambiguation naming can apply for any collisions. I raised the point in IRC but found no good reason why we keep it this way. So I want to get others' opinions on this. --PcjWowpedia wiki manager (TDrop me a line!C207,729 contributions and counting) 16:30, 16 April 2011 (UTC)


Votes

Yes
  1. Yes PcjWowpedia wiki manager (TDrop me a line!C207,729 contributions and counting) 16:30, 16 April 2011 (UTC) - (Nominated)
No

Comments