User:Eirik Ratcatcher/SeeAlsoPlot
From WoWWiki
The part that distresses me about the state of SeeAlso is not really that folks want to axe {{AlsoSee}}, it's that the replacement they chose doesn't really cover all the uses.
This started the See Also Crusade (hey, you got a better name?).
Starting in editing, I ran across Magic, which used a number of templates that I thought "I could do better". The {{for}} template referred me to wikipedia... and now I mourn for my lost ignorance.
So... A correspondance between Wowwiki and Wikipedia.
| Wikipedia | WoWwiki | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| --- | {{AlsoSee}} | no Wikipedia equivalent that I can find, "see also" comes closest |
| see | no direct equivalent | creates "Further Information: xxx" |
| See also | {{Seealso}} | |
| main | {{main}} | direct port, it looks like |
| Detail (née 'more') | no direct equivalent | {{for}} can create the equivalent text |
I would like to see this trimmed down:
| ! WoWwiki | Notes |
|---|---|
| {{main}} | top section association |
| {{AlsoSee}} | mid/end section association |
| See Also section | page-level association |
I care not the slightest if 'AlsoSee' is named something else.
If folks want to replace {{AlsoSee}} with (the new) {{see also}} I am fine with that, too. I think the icon calls out the link a bit better in cases where there isn't a big visual interruption (like a section header) above it, but perhaps it's simply that's how my eye has been trained.
I think at least some cases of {{AlsoSee}} should be See Also sections instead, which would involve reexamining the bulk of its uses.
But, I put this up for inspection, proposal-ish, so I don't end up changing things poorly.
--Eirik Ratcatcher 00:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
