Wikia

WoWWiki

Talk:Adys/What Wrath of the Lich King is not

101,774pages on
this wiki

Back to page | < User talk:Adys

Hillarious Edit

This page is hillarious. You ppl rock. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cowlinator (talk · contr).

Pure geniosity! Of course the level cap won't be raised to OVER 9000! But as a side note; We WILL be prepared! --Kulsprutejojjo 13:36, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Freaking hilarious --Ithar 06:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

What are you guys talking about? This page has got to be the stupidest article in WoWWiki Mr.X8 20:12, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Nope, April Fool's pages were worse. --Super Bhaal 20:29, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Wow... I can't believe anything could be even stupider. Mr.X8 20:52, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

HILARIOUS!! xD IbbertTheGnome 01:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Arthas WILL NOT be immune to Frost spells. Or else I'll...I'll... do something very painful to him.--Frosti 07:12, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, of coarse it's stupid. That's the point!--Darth Revan 17:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Darth Revan

Ha ha, just like to add my thanks to all who contributed to this atricle. Hilarious stuff :D Warchiefthrall 23:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

ZOMGZ u forgot to add not Leeroy Jenkins

Chill Mr.X8, were just having a little bit of fun here, no need to get uptight about it. Sure it's stupid, but hell, most things on a ton of different wikis (including this one) are! Toran Wildpaw of the Frenzyheart (talk) 15:18, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

This article is one of the BEST silly articles i ever heard i almost fell of the chair lathing XD, good job guys and Keep it ! --My life for Aiur (talk) 16:31, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

i Knew It was NOT many Edit

i hate this game i want GREAT SEA EXPANSION (is NOT Northrend Expansion)WITH NAGA AS NEW RACE—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dragonnagaofthewater (talk · contr).

I agree with the anonymous guy above, as I too want a Great Sea expansion with naga as playable race. Although, I don't hate this game. The WotLK expansion WILL NOT hinder my RP story, although my favorite part WILL NOT occur. Yet, that is. Give me my horde naga by the next expansion, and I will be happy. --Kulsprutejojjo 19:56, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

and i happy too but just i cant wait a year NOT a day Dragonnagaofthewater 15:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

* Barrens chat moved to Howling Fjord and Borean Tundra. *Fist of the North Star'd* --Super Bhaal 21:56, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

It's pointless, just as many silly articles are, why does WoWWiki even bother with them Mr.X8 22:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Because we have senses of humour? Kirkburn talk contr 23:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
yeah lol just added something too the article and some was keeping going at finaly he came up with Its not Real Life that made me laugh XD Dragonnagaofthewater 14:25, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Still, this has nothing to do about the article, in fact not on a wiki at all. Find a forum or something. IconSmall Satyr XAVIUS, the Satyr Lord (Praise · Creations) 19:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Emerald Dream will NOT be added.? Edit

Well, as many people already know, there was some really green(read:emerald) footage at the BlizzCon, many people speculate that Emerald dream indeed WILL be accessible in WOTLK, one of the reasons is that there's a portal to ED in Northrend. Ideas? Stopa 13:50, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Not accessible. That green place was one of the forest areas in Northrend.   Zurr  TC 13:54, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
well...that sure sucks IconSmall Tauren MaleStöpa(talk) 13:16, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
An what about Hyjal? Do we need to stare at the slimy waterfall on Felwood with salmon eyes forever? -- IconLarge Troll Male [1] , the Necroshadowmancer 18:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

We can't get everything in one expansion. Sorry guys, but that's the truth. IconSmall Satyr XAVIUS, the Satyr Lord (Praise · Creations) 19:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Blizzard can't fit a whole alternate version of Azeroth into the expansion along with Northrend anyway. Felindre

Protected? Edit

For something that looks like it was just protected it doesn't seem to be.   Zurr  TC 02:20, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Newly registered user protection. --Adys 02:53, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

The 2 Ring Edit

[The 2 Ring] should be removed from "Content that may not be introduced in future patches" because, of course, it will be added in 2.4 Winky.

They're finally adding the 2 ring......about time. =) User:Coobra/Sig3 22:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps we should remove the thing about the Gnome Punting range...i heard a rumor theyre adding it in 3.0 XD  Bill IconSmall Tauren Male (talk - contr - web)
If they were going to have a Gnome Punting mechanic, why would they wait? We already have Gnomeregan and the Dwarf/Gnome starting region, why didn't they start it when they made those zones?
Another thing that might be fun: Dwarf tossing. Felindre

Mistake Seen Edit

Actually the Eastern Kingdoms is going to be slightly altered. Remember Dalaran will no longer be in Hillsbrad.  :-) --Jineitaka et al. (Feathermoon Server) 16:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

More to Add Edit

Since the page appears to be locked even to registered users (not new ones) can we suggest other items to add? I would think that this would qualify as another example of gameplay that will NOT be in WotLK:

NOT WotLK gameplay

Why is this page protected? Edit

I have no idea. Maybe someone can explain? --Gengar orange 22x22 Fandyllic (talk · contr) 12:02 PM PST 27 Mar 2008

Unless someone can explain why this page is protected (admins afraid of us making it too silly?), I think it should be unprotected ASAP. I have great ideas for addition. DenimForce 15:49, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

There are little facts here, it could be a focus for vandalism.--SWM2448 20:59, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
And has been. User:Coobra/Sig3 21:20, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

GENGAR! Felindre

Revamped Zones Edit

Well, we're not-so-sure anymore... I'm not going to post DNP stuff, even if everyone knows, but it's clear that -at least- Eastern Kingdoms will be slightly revamped (SW and EPL). What about remove this paragraph from the page? IconSmall Gnome MaleIconSmall Mage Eraclito Runetotem-EU 23:57, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Nominating for deletion Edit

Deletion vote Edit

VotesEdit

Delete
  1. Delete User:Gourra/Sig2 12:15, 26 August 2008 (UTC) - (Nominated)
Keep
  1. Keep Dandin (talk · contr) 15:46, 26 August 2008 (UTC) - (no comment)
  2. Keep CogHammer Ose talk/3721 15:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC) - (It's funny. Protect it to prevent vandalism.)
  3. Keep Super Bhaal (talk) 15:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC) - (It's not hurting anybody.)
  4. Keep Inv misc orb 04Xavius, the Satyr Lord 15:33, 26 August 2008 (UTC) - (Come on, this is hilarious! We need silly things to survive, and this one is among the best.)
  5. Keep User:Coobra/Sig3 23:01, 26 August 2008 (UTC) - (Doesn't hurt to keep.)
  6. Keep Lanthas (talk · contr) 00:05, 27 August 2008 (UTC) - (no comment)
  7. Keep User:Zoarial 17:01, 29 August 2008 (GMT+1) - (I Laughed my donkey off!)
  8. Keep Dr.M.Ginius (talk · contr) - (Because this article sais what I always wanted to say and it is autocritic to the WoW fans and WoW and autocritic is good for the turtles)

CommentsEdit



Alright, this page has served its purpose. I'm not against silly things, but this "list" can and has been a target of vandalism and/or has little to no facts. User:Gourra/Sig2 12:15, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

You might as well delete Saurfang facts page too then. Toran Wildpaw of the Frenzyheart (talk) 15:22, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

While I don't much care to vote either way on this article, I do think that silly articles in particular could use a policy or at least some guidelines to regulate them. --PcjWoWWiki admin (TDrop me a line!C62,301 contributions and counting) 20:25, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
I fail to see why... every silly article has a humongous silly tag at the top. Anyone reading it is looking for humor, not facts. It has value as humor. Just don't expect anything else of value. Cowlinator (talk) 08:54, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Extende: What WotLK is not Edit

- It will NOT choke on vomit (even if it did, how would we know who's it is?) - It will NOT be an article like this one. That is all.

Wotlk wil NOT be continued by "Terror of the Tides" Expansion Edit

To bad people say it wil be more like "The Emerald Dream" after wotlk what wil be boring and i quit playin retail wow if that wil be announced. though TED (the emerald dream) is more like 7milion wow players who never heard of that. and a lack of dungeon and raid ideas is in that expansion. Anyway Wotlk is not nothing. i'm enjoying playing it :) NagaDark (talk) 11:56, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

What cataclysm is not Edit

We really need a 'what world of warcraft cataclysm is not'. That would be awesome! Minor miner7 (talk) 00:48, September 3, 2009 (UTC)

See Talk:World of Warcraft: Cataclysm#What Cataclysm is not.--SWM2448 01:43, September 3, 2009 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki