![[Batox]](http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/messaging/images/1/19/Avatar.jpg){kind=avatar}
From WoWWiki
Contents |
Welcome
If you have any questions, I would be happy to answer them, or you could drop them at the reference desk (where I might answer them anyway)!
Just wanted to say welcome, and to encourage you to contribute!
Want to help? Join a team!
Also, if you are here to help the community as a whole (and not just edit an article or two that you noticed needed changing), then I suggest you check out the various community teams - we could always use some help! Find one that suits you and leave a message on it's join page!
Hello :P
Batox! Cheers, hadn't noticed you here earlier :)
Armagone (User_talk:Armagone Special:Contributions/Armagone) 06:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
PS: (This might ring a bell ;))
Yogg-Saron
I don't think largely simplifying the Yogg-Saron page is helpful.
More specific complaints are saying stuff like on 25-man the 'preferred' strategy is the ferrying. Most guilds don't actually use that on 25-man because it will hinder you when you work into the hard modes of the encounter where you just need to count on everyone being able to dodge clouds. The old page just lists possible strategies and lets guilds pick their own.
The writing is also a bit too informal, like you were discussing it in an IM window (I.E. 'yoggs').
Further I don't understand changing the page for no reason to mostly remove a lot of things and not add much of anything anything new.
- Nitros14
This is a rather old discussion actually. Who's the intended audience of these tactics pages, raids new to the encounter, or veterans going for hardmode? My take is that these guides should be written for new groups first and foremost. The tactics should be the easiest and fail-safe methods, those which should be used while learning the encounter. It's ok to discuss advanced tactics, but under their own heading. And I daresay that "largely simplifying" is an extremely important and valuable goal by itself. Reducing page size by 25% by removing redundancy is a very good reason for a change.
- Batox
