Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
Register
Advertisement

User talk:Montag

Babel

Quest point Ask questions, rant and rave, or leave your message after the beep.
Post your questions, comments, concerns, and scathing criticisms here and I will respond as soon as possible. Remember:
  • If I post on your talk page and you post here, continue the discussion here.
  • If I post on your talk page and you reply there, I'll continue the discussion there.

File:Icon-chat.png Notable off-page discussions


Looking for a place to sharpen your wit or just add your two cents? Check out these topics.

Archives

  • 2006 Apr - 2006 Oct User talk:Montag/Archive01
  • 2006 Nov - 2007 Jan User talk:Montag/Archive02

  Icon-edit-22x22 Start a new discussion!    

Realm History

Thanks for your indications Montag, My intention was not to spam wowwiki so please let me explain myself. Realm History is more guild and player oriented than realm. It's main role is to track guilds progression in different instances. This guilds have to be categorized somehow so to arrange them by their realm was the best solution I found.

There is a section called "Guild Ranking" where players can easily see the guilds that cleared any instance and in what order they did. So I though it is natural that people that are browsing the Karazhan wowwiki page for example will also want to see the first guilds that cleared it, when they did it, and in which order. --FaithRaven 03:44, 9 February 2007 (EST)

That's certainly not a bad thing. As you can see, in one edit I did not remove the area where it mentioned the first guild to complete the instance and the citation for Realm History. I would suggest doing this for other articles if you're interested in generating popularity for the site while also contributing to the instance articles themselves. This should avoid any claims of wikisquatting. User:Montag/sig 09:58, 9 February 2007 (EST)

Horde/Naaru

So sayeth the Head Bookkeeper:

Hopefully the final word: Of the reasons given, only the M'uru point can be accepted as a reason for the naaru to dislike the Horde. Given that no viable in-game evidence has been put forward, and only a single viable lore reason given, this "theory" shall not be posted on any articles even loosely classified as lore- any attempt to do so shall be reverted with the scope of my powers as Head Bookkeeper. Repeat violation, in the unlikely event of occuring, shall be classed as vandalism and treated as such.
In the terms of adding this theory to the lore articles, this discussion is over. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 23:05, 12 February 2007 (EST)
I'll take that into consideration when dealing with infractions. User:Montag/sig 23:12, 12 February 2007 (EST)
Not if I get there first. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 23:21, 12 February 2007 (EST)

Hellscream Wiki

Hello! I'm in the process of updating the Hellscream server entry. You did a lot of work on this and want to thank you for getting it started. That said if you see anything that could use improvement beyond the initial edit, feel free to shout about it ;) --Kite 13:24, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Sure. I take a look at it from time to time. I'll be sure to keep my vigil. User:Montag/sig 14:08, 9 March 2007 (EST)

User talk:Montag/Master Plan

Maybe you should add that to the "discussion box". You know, it was your idea. ;P--Sky 14:29, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Heh... Yeah, that would be smart of me, wouldn't it? User:Montag/sig 14:35, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Medivh, Previously human`

Err... have you read something I haven't? --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 17:38, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Advertisement