I notice that all your contributions are centered around commentary on the utility of arcane magic and specialization. Many of the additions are of the editorial variety. For example, instead of merely stating that ability X does so-and-so, you tend to say whether this or that is a good deal. in strategy articles this would make good sense, but in spell/talent descriptors it is poor practice.
As I find time I will likely revisit some of these to provide some balance. Please do not be offended, I am just trying to preserve the encyclopedic nature of the wiki. Black angel y2k 12:29, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
Arcane Magic TalentsEdit
Fair enough. I was unsure how long my additons would last anyway, I only made comments becuase there was nothing there to begin with. Furthermore, as I have been a full arcane mage since day one I was a little dissapointed with the lack of...well anything. New Talent descriptions are better, if a little cynical but I would say that 'cos I love the arcane talents so much.
R.Lockheed 09:40, 23 April 2007 (EDT)