Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
No edit summary
Line 255: Line 255:
 
:I haven't yet played TBC, so I cannot comment on the in-game situation. From the comments of everybody I know (apart from yourself) the "AllianceGood/HordeEvil" doesn't come out as much as Marketing implies. My opposition comes largly from the "evil/sexy" image of the Blood elves. You should note that I am also vehemently opposed to the Night elves being in the Alliance.
 
:I haven't yet played TBC, so I cannot comment on the in-game situation. From the comments of everybody I know (apart from yourself) the "AllianceGood/HordeEvil" doesn't come out as much as Marketing implies. My opposition comes largly from the "evil/sexy" image of the Blood elves. You should note that I am also vehemently opposed to the Night elves being in the Alliance.
 
:Though I'm not opposed to the idea by any means, I'm sorry to admit that I have doubts about you writing such a section. The "evidence" you've discussed (ie, the Naaru) is not valid. If you'd like to prepare something to show me what you have in mind, then we'll see. --[[User:Ragestorm|<span style="border-bottom:1px dotted; cursor:help;" title="Admin">Ragestorm</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Ragestorm|talk]] &middot; [[Special:Contributions/Ragestorm|contr]])</small> 21:12, 21 February 2007 (EST)
 
:Though I'm not opposed to the idea by any means, I'm sorry to admit that I have doubts about you writing such a section. The "evidence" you've discussed (ie, the Naaru) is not valid. If you'd like to prepare something to show me what you have in mind, then we'll see. --[[User:Ragestorm|<span style="border-bottom:1px dotted; cursor:help;" title="Admin">Ragestorm</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Ragestorm|talk]] &middot; [[Special:Contributions/Ragestorm|contr]])</small> 21:12, 21 February 2007 (EST)
  +
  +
The section won't be on naaru horde relations its going to be out the view that Horde has gotten the wrong image in Warcraft,the alliance is now portrayed as saintly, and is commonly represented as the evil side especially in BC. Personally I blame a lot of this problem on Blizzard's refusal to make more then two factions.
  +
[[User:Angry ogre|Angry ogre]] 21:20, 21 February 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 02:20, 22 February 2007

Older comments moved to User talk:Ragestorm/Archive1 or User talk:Ragestorm/Archive2 or User talk:Ragestorm/Archive3 or User talk:Ragestorm/Archive4 or User talk:Ragestorm/Archive5 or User talk:Ragestorm/Archive6

All conversation welcome; however, I will ignore any User who uses Outland in the plural, and don't expect sympathy if you're complaining about retcons or lore inconsistencies. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 01:04, 10 January 2007 (EST)

Controversy

There is no need, ever, for controversy to stand in the way of the facts. You're caving into user preasure at the cost of integrity of articles. This is extremly bad practice for an admin, and if you maintain it, i'm officially requesting you step down or be removed as bookkeeper admin. And yes, i am telling you how to do your job, you apparently need to be told. --Zeal (talk - contr - web) 01:24, 10 January 2007 (EST)

What? Edit: after some searching you're referring to Talk:Antonidas? I've left my response on there. User:Kirkburn/Sig 09:50, 10 January 2007 (EST)
I've also left my response on Talk:Antonidas. However, please keep in mind that Rage is the head bookkeeper for a reason, and he has our full confidence. Please give him the benefit of the doubt before assuming things so that you can work with him to solve a problem. User:Montag/sig 15:15, 10 January 2007 (EST)

I've been accepted!!!

I've recently been accepted to all three universities I've applied to for fall semester later this year (two in Hawaii and one in Montana). I have decided to go with Hawaii in Manoa as it actually comes out cheaper and closer to my budget. I will continue to be in the lore team until then, helping as best I can, but can't guerentee how much time I'll have after start going there. I will probably not be carrying my Warcraft collection with me (with exception of the MMO itself), and thus will not be adding new material nearly as much, LOL. If the classes takes up most of my time leaving me little time to work on wowwiki I will step down, allowing someone else to take my position. But just thought you might be interested in the heads up. Baggins 19:32, 16 January 2007 (EST)

Heads-up appreciated and congrats. Manoa-I was planning to go there, but the fact that I stil had a high school contract meant I needed to stay within 200 miles of Manhattan. Still, you;ll be with us until the end of the summer. Just promise that you won't be too concerned about us- your help is appreciated greatly, but I would no more devote myself to WoWWiki while in Egypt than I would jump off Tower Bridge (but that's just me.)--Ragestorm (talk · contr) 19:49, 16 January 2007 (EST)
Agrees. Besides I'll be devoting more time to Scuba diving if I get my chance ;). ...cough... and the locals, :).Baggins 19:50, 16 January 2007 (EST)
If you're going to be an anthropologist, then the very association you suggest would be... unadvised. From a professional standpoint.--Ragestorm (talk · contr) 19:52, 16 January 2007 (EST)
What I can't date? Look for a wife with the same interests etc? LOL. I don't mean cultural hawaiin locals LOL... and I thought socialization was a benifit to university life :) LOL.
Ya, i'm specifically looking into archaelogy field with a secondary dedication to related geology, btw. Baggins 20:03, 16 January 2007 (EST)
I'm pure anthro/archaeo myself- since I'm to specialize in the Mediterranean, Hawaii would not have been the best choice, but I imagine the geology of the islands would be perfect for your interests.
Oh, and if anyone tries to tempt you into performing an ancient ritual to summon the spirit of the volcano goddess, please refrain from taking part. Never mind unprofessional, I speak from personal experience that vengful goddesses are never a good way to spruce up the party. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 22:48, 16 January 2007 (EST)
LOL. Now that's a story I want to hear the rest of, heh heh, you have piqued my interest.
Cool interests btw. My interests evolved out first an interest in geology specifically in paleontology (back as a wee child), back then I could name nearly every dinosaur someone would show me, LOL. However it moved into interest in Archaelogy, which has been more of a passion to me for years. I enjoyed reading and watching history of archaelogy all the time. So you can say that's been a lifelong passion. I took an earth sciences course in high school, enjoyed it. Once I reached college I've taken a courses in archaelogy and physical anthropology, and currently taking cultural anthropology, and enjoy how various anthropology fields interact. I also took a few courses in geology, and found I enjoyed it as much as I enjoyed archaelogy. But more interested in how it relates to way people lived, how they coped with geological forces, what materials they used for their artifacts, where those materials originated, how the land has changed between the time they first lived in an area to the present, etc. Additionally the knowledge of geology and anthropology can also apply to a field of forensics which is also an interest of mine, and one of the possible career choices I may persue (although I have more interest in musueum/field work).
Ya I have to admit I'm a science fan, if I had a long enough life, I have mild interest in other fields for example biology (marine biology specifically), but not certainly not enough to usurp my true interests, :). But I think what draws me to anthropology as a whole is an interest in history, and seeing how cultural histories developed, and this is through a strong interest in the material and artifact history.Baggins 09:55, 17 January 2007 (EST)

Im Back!

Hi there Rage. I dont think you even knew in the first place but ive been more or less away from WoW and WoWWiki since about October. I had many technical difficulties with my WoW and eventually gave up due to lack of help from Bliz, and thus lost my interest in the game and its lore. With the release of TBC my interest in WoW and its lore has been rekindelled so im back to prowl the pages of WoWWiki again :) --Diggory 03:55, 18 January 2007 (EST)

<snort> Welcome back. In general, not much has changed, apart from the plethora of edits and vandalism that happens over the course of a few months. Let's see... new policy debates, controversy pages rehashed, beta revelations of Maiev and the like, and seven new admins. You return just in time, as Karazhan may yet reveal more about your domain. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 08:15, 18 January 2007 (EST)

As discussed before i left in October, could i extend or replace my bookkeeper responsiblities to class lore? I tend to wander around those pages the most. Thanks Matey. --Diggory 09:49, 19 January 2007 (EST)

Sounds good, as I need someone to keep an eye on those pages.--Ragestorm (talk · contr) 13:50, 19 January 2007 (EST)

private messages

I like you guy's site, but how would I send a private message to one of the other registered users? I come here to read all the time and just registered a lil bit ago. Isn't there a bit more to protect the site though? This seems kinda scary. 1 Angry person could wipe out months of work in a few minutes couldn't they?

No, things can be reverted easily. please remember to sign your postsBaggins 02:56, 19 January 2007 (EST)
Once upon a time, there was a user e-mail function, but that was removed, as there was no way to filter who was sending the e-mails. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 08:28, 19 January 2007 (EST)

Corrupted Image

The image Image:Nightelves-160x.jpg is corrupted, I deleted from Night elf. --Voidvector 23:12, 23 January 2007 (EST)

Ah, so that was the problem? Glad that's sorted. All sorts of horrible things were going through my head. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 23:25, 23 January 2007 (EST)
Fixed and placed back! User:Kirkburn/Sig 04:55, 24 January 2007 (EST)

Red dragonflight, red dragonflight or Red Dragonflight?

Please share your thoughts :) I've changed it to red dragonflight for now, however I am not sure whether it is the correct choice. User:Jeoh/Signature

I'll just chime in and say under the race names policy, it would be red dragonflight. Though i've never agreed with that policy.. --User:Zeal/Sig 17:30, 25 January 2007 (EST)
I consent to the policy in general, but it's important to remember sources here. I'm checking the WoW webiste to see what they say. Probably both capitalized, as "red dragon" is the race and "Red Dragonflight" is the affiliation. Addendum: the Warcraft encyclopedia doen't mention the term "dragonflight", but it does leave the colors lowercase. This implies to me either "Red Dragonflight" or "red Dragonflight". I'm separated from my novels at the moment, so someone else will have to report on those.--Ragestorm (talk · contr) 17:34, 25 January 2007 (EST)
LoM refers to the blue dragonflight. Zeal, pretty much every novel and RPG book uses lower case names, as does WoW where it's not being used in a title. User:Kirkburn/Sig 00:49, 26 January 2007 (EST)
Debatable as you well know ;) --User:Zeal/Sig 10:16, 26 January 2007 (EST)
Debatable only if you ignore what Blizzard have decided, heh :P User:Kirkburn/Sig 11:14, 26 January 2007 (EST)

"Dragon" only appears to be capitalized when referring to an Aspect.--Ragestorm (talk · contr) 08:31, 26 January 2007 (EST)

I say lowercase. If its a common enough concept that's pretty broad, then it's like "warlock". But if it refers to a specific instance of it, like game mechanical, a la "Warlock" the player class, then maybe capital. But I can't think of a context where "red dragonflight" matches "Warlock".--Hobinheim (talk · contr) 11:35, 26 January 2007 (EST)
I say lowercase too. I can't think of anywhere I'd put Warlock with uppercase either, game mechanic or no. ---- Varghedin Varghedin  talk / contribs 08:46, 27 January 2007 (EST)

Though I still feel it's a faction title, since Kirkburn quoted a source, I guess we go by species. I'm separated from my novels at the moment, so I can't say which style they use. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 10:16, 27 January 2007 (EST)

In which novel do you recall the title being used? I've got most of them here. User:Jeoh/Signature
I would agree that if it was referring to a faction it should be capitalised ... but we're kinda of schtuck here since it's both a species and a faction, and there's really no distinction between them, argh. I mean, are there any renegade dragons from their flights? User:Kirkburn/Sig 12:53, 27 January 2007 (EST)
Well, my understanding was that "red dragon" is the species and "Red Dragonflight" is the faction; although WoW's "Brood of Nozdormu", etc, et al, has messed that up. Jeoh, try checking '"Day of the Dragon or the WotA trilogy.
A convention we could adopt is that "Dragonflight" refers to, collectively, all dragons of the relevant color who serve the Aspect's cause (this would help deal with Scales of Sand, Guardians of Time, etc.), but that there are subfactions within them.
While we don't know if renegade dragons exist, one could argue that Alextrasza's children who were raised by the Dragonmaw clan are red dragons, but not members of the Red Dragonflight, as they did not serve their Aspect. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 13:49, 27 January 2007 (EST)
Meeeeh... they may have been raised to be rouge, but Alexstrasza still thinks of them as her children according to what she tells Nekros right before she either eats him or burns him to a porky crisp. I'd say that 'dragon' is a species name, 'red dragonflight' is basically just a term to describe their colour and thus their affiliation (usually), and the 'Brood of X' type of name is the faction itself. ---- Varghedin Varghedin  talk / contribs 17:27, 27 January 2007 (EST)

it ain't easy being green

Talk:Orc#Skin_colour, need your input! User:Kirkburn/Sig 13:38, 26 January 2007 (EST)

Argent a fess sable between two dragons passant gardant sable

Talk:Deathwing#Baron_Sablemane_aka._Deathwing.3F. The section title has some relevance :P User:Kirkburn/Sig 16:59, 27 January 2007 (EST)

/emote tries to decipher what kind of French herbs Kirkburn had been smoking when he made the title of this topic ---- Varghedin Varghedin  talk / contribs 17:29, 27 January 2007 (EST)
It said "lions" and not dragons originally, if that helps? User:Kirkburn/Sig 18:08, 27 January 2007 (EST)
Just WTF ? Like a heraldic combination ?--K ) (talk) 19:05, 27 January 2007 (EST)
[1] User:Kirkburn/Sig 19:13, 27 January 2007 (EST)
I wuz right ! ^^ But just can't understand the "Folyfate or Follyfoot" ...--K ) (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2007 (EST)
Folyfate was the old name of a town, which now has a more modern spelling. That is likely the symbol of the Lord or similar from there. User:Kirkburn/Sig 19:36, 27 January 2007 (EST)
I coulda sworn the whole thing was French, with 'between two dragons' put in somewhere random. I guess I'm heraldrically challenged. (Look ma, I made another word) ---- Varghedin Varghedin  talk / contribs 20:34, 27 January 2007 (EST)

You are both completely insane. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 20:36, 27 January 2007 (EST)

Despair

Hi, could you do something with the Despair entry? Once it meant only some RPG creatures, but now Despair is also an epic sword that drops in Karazhan (I gave the source on the Despair's discussion page). I renamed the old article, but how am I supposed to delete the redirection and create a new article describing the sword? --Vysogota 23:13, 29 January 2007 (EST)

Find your way to the redirect page, edit it, and just delete the redirect template. You can start adding info from there. You might wish to discuss this with someone who handles item articles more that I do. -_Ragestorm (talk · contr) 23:58, 29 January 2007 (EST)

Gul'dan as favorite?

Why is Gul'dan one of your favorite characters? Out of curiosity. User:Montag/sig 20:03, 1 February 2007 (EST)

At the time I first started playing, I followed the D&D philosophy of evil not being so evil. Now that I (but not my D&Ding friend from the time) know better, I still find him interesting, largely because of his power and his relationship with Kil'jaeden. Those two seem to violate almost every rule of evil written. He's nowhere near the top of my list by any means (rearrange the syllables of my username to find out who's at the top), but he's an interesting character study, and I'm hoping that villans in my own writing can be improved by examining him and Kil'jaeden. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 22:01, 1 February 2007 (EST)
(You always start off with two indents. =c) How would you say they violate every "evil" rule written? They seem like pretty standard bad guys to me. User:Montag/sig 22:44, 1 February 2007 (EST)
Ok, I exagerrate, but they are relatively nontypical- for one thing, in a number of high fantasy, the evil warlord is double-crossed by his wizard, who then underestimates the dragon, or the evil wizard is an extension of the warlord. Also, Kil'jaeden displays unusual mercy (albiet for his own reasons), which, though found in other archvillans, is still pretty rare. Also, Kil'jaeden's threat has been quietly looming, never quite there, never quite not; hence, his name is whispered with fear, while "C'Thun", "Illidan" or "Azshara" are shouted. Even in the face of retcons, that hasn't really changed. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 22:55, 1 February 2007 (EST)
I definitely agree with you on Kil'Jaeden. Although, I find it hard to admire Gul'dan, in an evil sense. He doesn't seem as pleasantly unpredictable as Kil'Jaeden or others. User:Montag/sig 22:58, 1 February 2007 (EST)
That said, there is something to be said about one man who's lust for power altered the course of two worlds. In fact, in a cosmic sense, Gul'dan could be among those responsible for the Legion's eventual downfall: By sending the orcs to Azeroth, he caused the Alliance, which, in the future, shall unite with the Horde that Thrall reforged to form a grand Army of the Light. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 23:11, 1 February 2007 (EST)
I'm more partial to Nerz'hul for those same reasons: altering the fate of two worlds and somehow managing to be a really bad guy without being THE bad guy. User:Montag/sig 23:41, 1 February 2007 (EST)

MoM Talk

→ Info from the source! User talk:Kali Magdalene User:Kirkburn/Sig 08:03, 2 February 2007 (EST)

I have never even seen one of the RPG books in person (and I refuse to dish out the cash for a light reading books that cost more than college textbooks- for the price of MoM, I could get five fantasy novels with an eighth of the controversy). Moreover, Baggins maintains that all lore sources are equal, whereas I feel there is a hierarchy. Hence, I am biased towards these books. I think that Metzen's etheusiasm just got ahead of him here.--Ragestorm (talk · contr) 08:49, 2 February 2007 (EST)

Contact

Hey Ragestorm. Just wondering if you have any contact details you're willing to give out, or even the likelyhood of you coming into the IRC chan. :p Sure we could have some interesting lore discussion and would be nicer to have another voice for the lore issues in the chan.

Also, wondered if there is any lore communities or sites you hang out at. --User:Zeal/Sig 21:36, 6 February 2007 (EST)

My lore activities are exclusive to WoWWiki (you'd think I'd be a bit more effective with that). I find the forum system annoying. As for IRC, let's just say I'm still reviewing. Mac programs are on the pricey side, and I haven't yet the time to figure it out at the moment. Since you've added another pressure point to the issue, I'll get it sorted the week after next.
My e-mail is Dargonis80@yahoo.com, if you've got the odd question you don't want the wiki to see. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 23:15, 6 February 2007 (EST)
Isn't there any free Mac IRC clients? :S Anyways, nothing private, just easier to talk over IRC and IM, think it would be nice to have a chat with you on lore some time, get your perspective on things, plus get your opinion more voiced in the lore issues that get discussed at times. Hopefully see ya soon on there :) --User:Zeal/Sig 23:19, 6 February 2007 (EST)

I'll give you my IM later- as it's the end of the first, err... hexmester?... I've got a busy week ahead of me, so I'll get back to you on that. Addendum: I have yet to locate a free IRC client for the Mac. It's the curse of using a better computer.--Ragestorm (talk · contr) 23:23, 6 February 2007 (EST)

The IRC channel has about 40 people on at any one time now... Make it 41! :) IRC is awesome, no pressure to chat at all, you can just leave it in the background and watch the crazies talk. I use XChat - the Mac OSX build is here:[2]. Free, and easy! User:Kirkburn/Sig 23:30, 6 February 2007 (EST)
Someone just mentioned to me that Colloquy is a good Mac client: [3] User:Kirkburn/Sig 23:34, 6 February 2007 (EST)

Hmm... your appearance was just a little too sudden to be a coincidence. Wait a minute, isn't it 4:40 in the morning where you are? -_Ragestorm (talk · contr) 23:39, 6 February 2007 (EST)

Haha, it's an intervention Ragestorm, see the light, come to IRC and stay up until the late hours like the rest of us ;) --User:Zeal/Sig 23:44, 6 February 2007 (EST)

The race to 70 overtook me! Gonna 'sort-of' sleep in a while, my body clock is all messed up again :P In any case, I'm 70, I managed it 30mins before server shutdown and I have my snowy gryphon! So all is good. User:Kirkburn/Sig 23:48, 6 February 2007 (EST)

And people say the English are boring. Either way, I win. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 23:50, 6 February 2007 (EST)
Out of curiousity, What server do you play on and what lvl are you?

The Ogre

I'd suggest just letting Ogre burn himself out. The less we respond, the less he'll have to respond to. User:Montag/sig 21:55, 10 February 2007 (EST)

You raise the best point I've heard in a while. I just couldn't let that personnel line go, though. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 22:00, 10 February 2007 (EST)
And dude, get IRC. =c) User:Montag/sig 22:09, 10 February 2007 (EST)
I'd insult you right now, but I'm not fluent in binary, so for now, I'll just say "working on it." -_Ragestorm (talk · contr) 22:14, 10 February 2007 (EST)
I just hate to have you missing our sarcastic comments. User:Montag/sig 22:16, 10 February 2007 (EST)

The Tyrande and Rouge Bokkeeper issue

If I angered you I must apologize, for it was not my intention to do so. After rewriting practically the entire Shandris article (as you may have noticed) I took a look at the Tyrande article, and to my great despair found that the War of the Ancients section there depicted not the events in Knaak's novels, but the earlier lore, before the retcon. The situation is not Storyline and Alternative storyline (Knaak's), but True storyline (Knaak's) and storyline that's been retconned away. Knaak's version is the correct one, so upon seeing the other depiction in an article as important as Tyrande's, and recalling a notion on the bookkeepers page saying they regarded Knaak's storyline as correct, I assumed the bookkeepers had just missed rewriting that section. Therefore, I did the most resonable thing I could think of; Began correcting it myself. I was going to write a whole new version of that particular section in the Tyrande-article, but hadn't time at the moment, so I left a note saying I would do so within shortly. I had no idea that Tyrande was on your "watch", nor that there were "official channels" to joining the bookkeepers. The whole "rogue bookkeeper"-thing was meant as a joke, and a message that I am continously adding lore-related material to WoWWiki, and would like to join the bookkeeper-order, but did not know how to do so. Judging by your repy, I've made a buffoon out of myself, and would like to apologize humbly for doing so. -- User:NerdKnight Xavier 12:35, 11 February, 2007 (EST)

Your POV need a bit of work, but we'll let bygones be bygones. You must exusce me- given the sort of rif-raff I must usually put in their place, I take such alterations seriously. I don't think your more recent edits have been much trouble...
As for the Bookkeepers, most of the community management is being rehashed, so I'll let you know when we're finished. Who knows? There are times when everybody needs a good rogue...--Ragestorm (talk · contr) 09:06, 11 February 2007 (EST)

On my travels...

Standing on Theramore docks I espied:

Privateer Groy yells: Where in the Outlands are those shipments? For days they keep me waiting!

Heh ;) Now, I didn't say it directly I hasten to add... User:Kirkburn/Sig 19:19, 11 February 2007 (EST)

PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!!

Can you help me please? If you have War of the Ancients trilogy (vol. 2 and 3), Sunwell manga (vol. 2 (and vol. 1, but it's not so required)) and Rise of the Horde novel PLEASE send them to me by E-mail (in computer text version of course=) ). I can't buy these books in my country, send me some of them that you have. You'll help me A LOT!!! My E-mail: is70@rambler.ru Mardook

I do not have the capability to help you, I'm afraid. I have the book versions, and I don't have the time to retype or scan everything. Sorry.--Ragestorm (talk · contr) 13:00, 13 February 2007 (EST)

Questions

Can you answer my questions in Old Gods discussion page? Mardook

elemental spirits language

When you release some elemental spirits called, "living fire" in Nagrand they speak in Kalimag, saying "Reth Reth Reth", whatever that means. Yes, I don't know how they physically say "Reth Reth Reth", I have no idea if they have same mode of communication with a mouth or something else... All I know is that's what they say in the game :p...Baggins 23:32, 13 February 2007 (EST)

There is always the possibility with spiritual beings that you are hearing something different from what they are saying, or they are causing you to hear something even thought they didn't speak it audibly. Mainly, there's always the possibility that speech is not tied to some physical limitation. User:Montag/sig 23:49, 13 February 2007 (EST)

Images, you say....

Well, why are these pics allowed?

with others...

--  Shandris  talk / contribs 18:23, 17 February 2007 (EST) 15:36, 17 February 2007 (EST)

Largely, because, as I said, I'm not particularly qualified to talke about datamining (I shouldn't have mentioned it). The issue is more to the fact that the images you removed are better than the ones you replaced them with- that Vashj, particularly, was especially unpleasant. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 15:54, 17 February 2007 (EST)
Ladyvash
In what way was it unpleasant? --  Shandris  talk / contribs 18:23, 17 February 2007 (EST)
Unspeakably bland background, unflattering pose, and the image doesn't convey anything that the image you removed lacks. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 22:59, 17 February 2007 (EST)

Horde controversy

Ragestorm I think you should see the list of poeple who feel the horde is being ruined in BC Angry ogre 21:01, 21 February 2007 (EST)

I will, as soon as someone shows me. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 21:02, 21 February 2007 (EST)

Heres the list

1.Well first of all theres you. You admited it in a discussion on talk horde.

2.Theres also Zexx who admitted it in the blood elf discussion

3.Ring of fire in the horde analysis section

4.Drek'thar

5.I think Odalwa also said he was displeased with the horde's current lore

I think thats enough people to warrant a controversy section Angry ogre 21:03, 21 February 2007 (EST)

I haven't yet played TBC, so I cannot comment on the in-game situation. From the comments of everybody I know (apart from yourself) the "AllianceGood/HordeEvil" doesn't come out as much as Marketing implies. My opposition comes largly from the "evil/sexy" image of the Blood elves. You should note that I am also vehemently opposed to the Night elves being in the Alliance.
Though I'm not opposed to the idea by any means, I'm sorry to admit that I have doubts about you writing such a section. The "evidence" you've discussed (ie, the Naaru) is not valid. If you'd like to prepare something to show me what you have in mind, then we'll see. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 21:12, 21 February 2007 (EST)

The section won't be on naaru horde relations its going to be out the view that Horde has gotten the wrong image in Warcraft,the alliance is now portrayed as saintly, and is commonly represented as the evil side especially in BC. Personally I blame a lot of this problem on Blizzard's refusal to make more then two factions. Angry ogre 21:20, 21 February 2007 (EST)