m (→Signing) |
Eirik Ratcatcher@legacy41591109 (talk | contribs) (Source) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Please to be remembering to sign at the end of your comments in the talk pages using (<nowiki> ~~~~ </nowiki>), it makes it a lot easier to see who says what. {{User:Coobra/Sig2}} 00:01, 6 January 2008 (UTC) |
Please to be remembering to sign at the end of your comments in the talk pages using (<nowiki> ~~~~ </nowiki>), it makes it a lot easier to see who says what. {{User:Coobra/Sig2}} 00:01, 6 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Source == |
||
| + | |||
| + | Re [[Schematic: Firework Launcher]], Item pages that only discuss the source of an item need not have a section titled "source". --[[User:Eirik Ratcatcher|Eirik Ratcatcher]] 20:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 20:37, 25 February 2008
Welcome!
Hello, TAP3AH, and welcome to the WoWWiki! Thank you for your contributions, and we encourage you to continue contributing!
Some useful notes:
- The things to do category has lots of things to keep you busy!
- Some WoWWikians are also very often on our IRC Channel, chat.freenode.net, #wowwiki.
- As a community it is easier to get large amounts of maintenance and community projects done in teams - we like to encourage each wiki-user to join one or two. Check out Community teams for more info!
- WoWWiki isn't an absolute democracy, but many decisions are voted on. See a list of votes in progress.
- Check out the site guidelines and policies!
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a WoWWikian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, just ask on the relevant talk page, or visit the Village pump.
Again, welcome! --Pcj (T•C) 11:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Signing
Please to be remembering to sign at the end of your comments in the talk pages using ( ~~~~ ), it makes it a lot easier to see who says what. 
(Sssss/Slithered) 00:01, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Source
Re 
[Schematic: Firework Launcher], Item pages that only discuss the source of an item need not have a section titled "source". --Eirik Ratcatcher 20:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)