User talk:Tekkub
From WoWWiki
Contents |
Consortium Reputation Spanbar
Hi,
Don't quite understand why you insist it's wrong to "fix" this spanbar, since you clearly can't do the Heroics until revered anyway.
Also, every other faction page represents this truth, just not the Consortium one (which you changed back to Heroic spanning from Honored through Exalted).
May I ask for a clarification here, because I really don't get why you did that :)
~Feenyx
- Because you don't get the key from the Consortium, so revered with them is not required. We've fixed that many many many times, and I just got sick of fixing it. TeжubԎ Ҩ Ѡ 03:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
BC healing equipment/Neck summary
I have to say I'm not very keen on the new format you have implemented on the above page. It makes it harder to compare the items. Timb0h 00:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Red Link / Blue Link
They all seem to have switched. Is this on purpose? Posted by: EGingell (talk | contribs) on 16:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- I had forgotten what day it is, this must be an April Fools prank. :p~ Posted by: EGingell (talk | contribs) on 18:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Working on Fixing my contributions to conform to WW:EL
It's being done now. Vanman2099 (talk)
elinks comment
I saw that you are the one to add the request for the elinks message. Why the need for it? And... you do realize that it is unmaintainable, don't you? --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 22:09, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Because every new person that comes along doesn't read WW:EL. We need SOMETHING that points them there. It's became a major PITA to keep fixing people's links that don't read the policy, so I want something that I can point at and say "you didn't read the big warning" when I erase their shit... I'm basically done fixing bad links. TeжubԎ Ҩ Ѡ 22:12, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- I notice that your edits are largely cleaning up after the addition of raidguru elink adds, on Boss pages. I assume you are aware, though, that your request includes item and recipe pages? I had not known of your elinks issue because the malformed links don't tend to occupy the pages I most frequent. Seeing how often you've been changing elinks, though, I see why you might be unhappy with them. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 17:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I am aware that it encompasses the mass majority of the wiki's pages. That's the point. While the raid pages are the most likely to get links, there's still a chance that say, someone opens a new DB site (gee that never happens) and decides to run a bot to add their links to all those pages... I don't feel right acting against those people when they've not read WW:EL, and they shouldn't be pointed there only after they fuck up dozens of pages. We need something in place that they should see BEFORE they go adding elinks. TeжubԎ Ҩ Ѡ 19:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
