User talk:Whitedragon254
From WoWWiki
Again, welcome! --Pcj (T•C) 03:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Frostborn
Please see WW:NAME. Thanks. Frostborn is the correct location. --Sky (t · c · w) 18:59, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- First off, the names Frostborn and Frost dwarf are not synonymous to any extent. Just because the frost dwarves are part of the Frostborn does not necessarily mean that the Frostborn are all frost dwarves.
- Secondly, "The Taunka" and "Taunka" would appear in this case to be synonymous, so in fact, the two pages should probably be merged. In the event that they are not synonymous (I do not know if they are or not), than the naming scheme they employ is an exemption to the rule, as the two need to be disambiguated somehow, and keeping them at their official names is easier than naming one of them "Taunka (faction)". --Sky (t · c · w) 19:21, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- Negative. See The Scale of the Sands, The Defilers, and other such articles. WW:NAME says that we get rid of the "The" in names unless a disambiguation is needed or the page is about an item (I think there are a couple other exceptions, but those are the main ones). In this case, if we both agree that they should not be merged, than Frostborn is the correct location of the page. --Sky (t · c · w) 01:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
No pic thing
I hope I didn't come off like a butthead. You didn't do anything wrong. Coobra shouldn't have made the change to WoWWiki:Nopics. That was essentially changing policy without any input. --
Fandyllic (talk · contr) 8:35 PM PST 6 Sep 2008