Gil21959@legacy41542608 (talk | contribs) (→Good thoughts: new section) |
Zeldain71460@legacy41590217 (talk | contribs) (→Artifact Color.: new section) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Thanks for dropping by to give me your thoughts. Kirkburn had done so as well privately over the last few weeks, so I circled back with him and asked his advice on what we should do. Hopefully you'll see my reply on the village pump as a reasonable starting point. Believe it or not, we think long and hard about each change and have fierce debates internally [http://world.wikia.com/wiki/User:Gil<font color="Blue">Gil</font>] ([http://world.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Gil<font color="Blue" size="1">talk</font>])<staff /> 05:02, 30 December 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks for dropping by to give me your thoughts. Kirkburn had done so as well privately over the last few weeks, so I circled back with him and asked his advice on what we should do. Hopefully you'll see my reply on the village pump as a reasonable starting point. Believe it or not, we think long and hard about each change and have fierce debates internally [http://world.wikia.com/wiki/User:Gil<font color="Blue">Gil</font>] ([http://world.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Gil<font color="Blue" size="1">talk</font>])<staff /> 05:02, 30 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Artifact Color. == |
||
| + | |||
| + | Until we can resolve officially the status of "Artifact" items, everything is speculation. The only official statements and documentation have all indicated that artifacts are red in color. So until that changes, we need to leave the artifact color as red. |
||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Zeldain|Zeldain]] ([[User talk:Zeldain|talk]]) 04:50, 2 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 04:50, 2 January 2009
To Bot or Not to Bot - That is the Question ;-)
If you've got a bot, maybe you would be interested in making a new user (such as User:MurphBot) so the admins can tag it as such. :) --Sky (t · c · w) 23:45, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
- Thanks for the feedback. I did ponder a bot account, but decided against it after mulling over the WoWWiki:Bots article, since I didn't think a maximum of 150-ish edits qualified as truly massive, and I don't plan on running it repeatedly - that was (hopefully) a one-time cleanup of Category:Leatherworking. If the admins would prefer that I do such things from a bot user, I'd be happy to oblige (for reference, I was using pywikipediabot's "category.py tidy" script, manually assigning subcategories to trim down the main leatherworking category). --Murph 00:32, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
{{extrasuperspeedydelete}} of "ClassX builds"
WoW... Is that almost a year ago? o_o
As for the super-speedy, there's no reason to create it, that I can see. --Sky (t · c · w) 06:22, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Borrowing a some lines
I was using {{Preview}}, but you do have a way with words... so hope you don't mind but I took what you've said to a few and made {{Editing}}. 
{T•C) 08:48, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Cool, I'm very happy for you to do that - it will save some typing in the future.
--Murph (talk · contr) 08:53, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
RE: Deprecate Elinks-object/wotlk?
It's deprecated. Feel free to change all instances of the template. g0urra[T҂C] 18:13, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Good thoughts
Thanks for dropping by to give me your thoughts. Kirkburn had done so as well privately over the last few weeks, so I circled back with him and asked his advice on what we should do. Hopefully you'll see my reply on the village pump as a reasonable starting point. Believe it or not, we think long and hard about each change and have fierce debates internally Gil (talk) 05:02, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Artifact Color.
Until we can resolve officially the status of "Artifact" items, everything is speculation. The only official statements and documentation have all indicated that artifacts are red in color. So until that changes, we need to leave the artifact color as red.
Zeldain (talk) 04:50, 2 January 2009 (UTC)