User talk:Zurr72217

Reverting Edits

I've noticed that people (including myself) revert edits and add comments that don't show what edits were made.

Kirkburn does some brilliant comments such as

Reverted edits made by Karamazov (talk); to last edit by Lindorm - 2 Items added are World Drops, not Karazhan

That way we inform people of which article versions we're going back to and why :)

Only messaging you because we were reverting the same article at the same time ^^ --User:Kiltek/Sig 06:54, 28 March 2007 (EDT)

First Alliance to ride a nether drake into Shattrath City.

Screen shot plx! =O User:Kiltek/Sig 05:54, 14 April 2007 (EDT)

Sure thing, i'll put it in my user profile.
 ∙ Zurr  Talk ∙ Contr 12:16, 14 April 2007 (EDT)

Nice, now im going to give you a personal mission. Create/Update the Netherdrake Questline.. ;) User:Kiltek/Sig 12:44, 14 April 2007 (EDT)

Nether drake questline is really just talking to Mordenai again and he sends you to netherwing ledge where you need to do a bunch of quests for the Dragonmaw and some goblins.
 ∙ Zurr  Talk ∙ Contr 14:30, 14 April 2007 (EDT)

Then go go lazy warlock! Createth a page so I may get one with ease! User:Kiltek/Sig

When making item articles

Please use {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|<article name>|right|left}} for the float. It serves the same purpose as {{If|{{Equals|{{PAGENAME}}|<article name>}}|then=right|else=left}}, except it's easier and more efficient for the wiki. Thanks! --User:Sky2042/Sig 08:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

I've just been copy/pasting from another page, and trying to make necessary adjustments for the page to fit the item. In fact, why not just use "right"?
 ∙ Zurr  Talk ∙ Contr 08:31, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

We used to. Tekkub (talk · contr) changed it, and I wasn't exactly perturbed against the idea, even if I didn't understand why. :) --User:Sky2042/Sig 08:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

I know why now, it allows it to float to the right on its own page and to the left when used on another page.
 ∙ Zurr  Talk ∙ Contr 05:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Aye, it does do that, but it could just be forced into a float of our choosing by putting a table around it. Not the most elegant solution, but it would work. --User:Sky2042/Sig 05:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

noinclude / onlyinclude

Could you be so kind to use noinclude, instead of onlyinclude. the second type does not appear to work correctly. i've reverted the darkmoon card wrath, and voidheart as they were messing up page layouts elsewhere,, but you might want to look back trough your other edits. User:CrazyJack/Sig 05:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Netherspite Infernal

Where have Blizzard written that the demons in the Prince-fight are named "Netherspite Infernals"? It makes no sense, since they look exactly the same as the Abyssals in Blade's Edge Mountains for instance. Infernals are green. --Odolwa 19:50, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

[Sense Demons] and [Track Demons]   Zurr  T ∙ C 22:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

I see. Will be sure to try it next time I'm there. Very mystical indeed. --Odolwa 21:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

2300

"You are an idiot" etc

You suck. :P --User:Sky2042/Sig 09:27, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Kek!   Zurr  T ∙ C 03:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Where then?

Would you prefer the names in Voidwalker (Warlock pet)? Cuz either way, I personally think that they really should be included. -- Grihm Bloodtusk 00:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Do you have any idea how many there are?   Zurr  T ∙ C 00:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

They're combinations of prefixes and suffixes afaik, there are no "set" names. User:Kirkburn/Sig3 00:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: noinclude tags

I had accidently removed the noinclude tags from those pages in question, causing the in-line display of the items on the respective tier-4 set pages to be seriously out of whack, so it was very necessary to re-add them. :)

It's all fixed now. I'll just have to be more careful to not overwrite those tags next time. Oops. :)

Ardor 15:53, 16 October 2007 (UTC)