Changes: Will of the Fallen Exarch

Revision as of 23:41, 9 February 2011

Welcome! -Howbizr (talk) 21:40, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

haha, fancy seeing you here -Auron 01:55, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Reply

I replied to your post. Howbizr^(t·c) 1:43 PM, 28 Sep 2009 (EDT)

Loot or item

No one has ever told me why, but I suspect we're "supposed to use" {{loot}} on big pages like the patch ones because it loads faster than {{item}}. You can ask Gourra or some other crazy contributor if you really want to know. Howbizr^(t·c) 6:07 AM, 10 Oct 2009 (EDT)

Gift of the Naaru coefficients

The coefficients you put in for GotN in Spell_power_coefficient are flipped from the coefficients in [Gift of the Naaru], and I'd expect SP to have a better coefficient than AP.

I don't have a Draenei, so can't test.

Also, "does cannot receive bonus" is a bit awkward.

regards Erdluf (talk) 12:31, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

It was a copy / paste error. I intended to list the AP coefficient first in the attack power coefficient article and the SP coefficient first in the spell power coefficient, the spell power coefficient article has been corrected. I've replaced the notes with "A single casting of Gift of the Naaru does not receive bonus healing from both attack power and spell power, instead, each casting uses the higher of the two bonuses.", which should be clearer. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 02:50, October 15, 2009 (UTC)

Omitting any leading "The"s

If you disagree with the policy, you can vote to change it, as it has been questioned by some here.--SWM24 48 22:40, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

I made the move because I couldn't find any naming conventions in the manual of style and wasn't aware of the naming policy. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 03:20, October 23, 2009 (UTC)

Hello there...

To the "Editors who don't know why they're using the speedy deletion tag probably shouldn't be using it" part,... it was me adding the speedy-tag, I guess he (Coobra) thought I knew what I was going. Well, apparently not; Long story short. TherasTaneel (talk) 04:02, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

It's not a big deal, deletions are easily reversible around here. Thanks. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 04:16, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

Gallywix

First mentioned in Lands of Mystery? What page? Sssssssssssssssssssssssss For Pony! (^Sssss/_Slithered) 00:16, July 10, 2010 (UTC)

I don't have the book, but the Bilgewater Port article says it's on page 76. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 00:26, July 10, 2010 (UTC)

No it doesn't. See where the reference is connected to.

(^Sssss/_Slithered) 00:29, July 10, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, thanks for fixing my mistake. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 01:05, July 10, 2010 (UTC)

Your opinion is desired

Hey, we're pretty much settled on leaving Wikia, but I wanted to see if you had any input. Thanks. --PcjWowpedia wiki manager (TDrop me a line!•C207,729 contributions and counting) 01:19, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

archaeology light ranges

Have you actually found that Yellow (or green for that matter) indicates a longer range, on larger sites? I have not seen this to be so. On the other hand, Red can indicate anything from it's minimum distance to the absolute far side of the dig site. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 21:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I noticed extremely short yellow ranges while using an archaeology addon which measures distance from the last survey point in some of the smaller dig sites such as Terror Wing Path. I'm also pretty sure I also read about it on mmo-champion, curse or wowhead. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 01:21, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Actually, it looks like it doesn't depend on the size of the dig site. According to a comment on wowhead's archaeology page, the light colour indicates the distance to the find in 3-D space. In other words, if there's a find at the bottom of a cliff or tower and you survey from the top of it, you could get a yellow light because it's 50 yards down. If this is true, it would explain why I've been getting both yellow and red lights for finds in the 70 to 80 yard range. I'll try to test this out the next time I'm at an appropriate dig site. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 23:41, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{| class="navbox" style="font-size:100%; margin-bottom:0.5em;" cellpadding="5"
-<onlyinclude>{{tooltip
+|-
-|float={{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Will of the Fallen Exarch|right|left}}
+! Welcome to WoWWiki!
-|width=18em
+|- style="text-align:left;"
-|durability=90
+|
-|sell={{cost|8|42|37}}
+[[Image:Wiki.png|70px|right|Wiki logo]]
-|icon=INV_Mace_08
+Hello, '''{{BASEPAGENAME}}''', and welcome to '''[[WoWWiki:About|WoWWiki]]''', the Warcraft wiki! Thank you for your contributions, and we heartily [[WoWWiki:Be bold in updating pages|encourage you to continue contributing]]!
-|quality=Rare
-|bind=BoP
-|type=Mace
-|slot=Main Hand
-|itemid=27876
-|ilvl=115
-|name=Will of the Fallen Exarch
-|level=70
-|speed=1.80
-|dps=41.4
-|dmg=35 - 114
-|attrib=+19 Stamina
-|effect=Equip: Improves resilience rating by 21.<br />Equip: Increases healing done by up to 227 and damage done by up to 76 for all magical spells and effects.}}</onlyinclude>
+Some links you may find useful:
-==Source==
+* The [[:Category:Things to do|'''things to do''' category]] has lots of things to keep you busy!
-{{Stub/Item}}
+* Check out the '''[[Portal:Community|Community portal]]''' for some useful editors' links.
+* Note that WoWWiki isn't an absolute democracy, but many decisions are [[WoWWiki:Voting policy|voted on]]. See a [[:Category:Votes in progress|list of '''votes in progress''']].
+* Many WoWWikians frequent our [[WoWWiki:IRC|'''IRC Channel''']], on [irc://chat.freenode.net/wowwiki chat.freenode.net, #wowwiki].
+* '''Finally, please check out the site [[WoWWiki:Guidelines|guidelines]] and [[WoWWiki:Policies|policies]]!'''
+We hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[WoWWiki:WoWWikians|WoWWikian]]!<br/>Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (<code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>) as this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, just ask on the relevant talk page, or visit the [[Forum:Index|'''WoWWiki Forums''']].
-==External links==
+|}
-{{elinks-item|27876}}
+:''Welcome! -[[User:Howbizr|Howbizr]] ([[User talk:Howbizr|talk]]) 21:40, 21 February 2009 (UTC)''
-[[Category:Maces]]
+haha, fancy seeing you here -[[User:Auron|<font color="black">Auron</font>]] 01:55, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
-[[Category:Rare Items]]
+== Reply ==
+I [[Talk:Pet_abilities#Scaling|replied]] to your post. {{User:Howbizr/sign}} 1:43 PM, 28 Sep 2009 (EDT)
+== Loot or item ==
+No one has ever told me ''why,'' but I suspect we're "supposed to use" {{t|loot}} on big pages like the patch ones because it loads faster than {{t|item}}. You can ask [[User:Gourra|Gourra]] or some other crazy contributor if you really want to know. {{User:Howbizr/sign}} 6:07 AM, 10 Oct 2009 (EDT)
+== Gift of the Naaru coefficients ==
+The coefficients you put in for GotN in [[Spell_power_coefficient]] are flipped from the coefficients in [[Gift_of_the_Naaru]], and I'd expect SP to have a better coefficient than AP.
+I don't have a Draenei, so can't test.
+Also, "does cannot receive bonus" is a bit awkward.
+regards [[User:Erdluf|Erdluf]] ([[User talk:Erdluf|talk]]) 12:31, October 14, 2009 (UTC)
+:It was a copy / paste error. I intended to list the AP coefficient first in the [[attack power coefficient]] article and the SP coefficient first in the [[spell power coefficient]], the spell power coefficient article has been corrected. I've replaced the notes with "A single casting of Gift of the Naaru does not receive bonus healing from both attack power and spell power, instead, each casting uses the higher of the two bonuses.", which should be clearer. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker|Gordon Ecker]] ([[User talk:Gordon Ecker#top|talk]]) 02:50, October 15, 2009 (UTC)
+== Omitting any leading "The"s ==
+If you disagree with the policy, you can vote to change it, as it has been questioned by some [[Wowpedia talk:Naming policy#.22The_....22_articles.3B_vote_start|here]].--{{User:Sandwichman2448/Sig}} 22:40, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
+:I made the move because I couldn't find any naming conventions in the manual of style and wasn't aware of the naming policy. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker|Gordon Ecker]] ([[User talk:Gordon Ecker#top|talk]]) 03:20, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
+==Hello there...==
+To the "Editors who don't know why they're using the speedy deletion tag probably shouldn't be using it" part,... it was me adding the speedy-tag, I guess he (Coobra) thought I knew what I was going. Well, apparently not; Long story short. [[User:TherasTaneel|TherasTaneel]] ([[User talk:TherasTaneel|talk]]) 04:02, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
+:It's not a big deal, deletions are easily reversible around here. Thanks. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker|Gordon Ecker]] ([[User talk:Gordon Ecker#top|talk]]) 04:16, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
+== Gallywix ==
+First mentioned in Lands of Mystery? What page? {{User:Coobra/Sig4}} 00:16, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
+:I don't have the book, but the [[Bilgewater Port]] article says it's on page 76. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker|Gordon Ecker]] ([[User talk:Gordon Ecker#top|talk]]) 00:26, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
+::No it doesn't. See where the reference is connected to. {{User:Coobra/Sig4}} 00:29, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
+:::Sorry, thanks for fixing my mistake. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker|Gordon Ecker]] ([[User talk:Gordon Ecker#top|talk]]) 01:05, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
+==Your opinion is desired==
+Hey, we're pretty much settled on [[Forum:Should WoWWiki leave Wikia?|leaving Wikia]], but I wanted to see if you had any input.  Thanks. --{{User:Pcj/sig}} 01:19, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
+== archaeology light ranges ==
+Have you actually found that Yellow (or green for that matter) indicates a longer range, on larger sites?  I have not seen this to be so.  On the other hand, Red can indicate anything from it's minimum distance to the absolute far side of the dig site. --[[User:Eirik Ratcatcher|Eirik Ratcatcher]] ([[User talk:Eirik Ratcatcher|talk]]) 21:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
+:Yes, I noticed extremely short yellow ranges while using an archaeology addon which measures distance from the last survey point in some of the smaller dig sites such as [[Terror Wing Path]]. I'm also pretty sure I also read about it on mmo-champion, curse or wowhead. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker|Gordon Ecker]] ([[User talk:Gordon Ecker#top|talk]]) 01:21, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
+::Actually, it looks like it doesn't depend on the size of the dig site. According to a comment on [http://www.wowhead.com/skill=794/archaeology wowhead's archaeology page], the light colour indicates the distance to the find in 3-D space. In other words, if there's a find at the bottom of a cliff or tower and you survey from the top of it, you could get a yellow light because it's 50 yards down. If this is true, it would explain why I've been getting both yellow and red lights for finds in the 70 to 80 yard range. I'll try to test this out the next time I'm at an appropriate dig site. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker|Gordon Ecker]] ([[User talk:Gordon Ecker#top|talk]]) 23:41, 9 February 2011 (UTC)