Undecided - Though there's a long history with the site, it would be nice to see some edits along the lines of new pages and major updates, as well as an increase in number of edits; i.e. more consistent editing pattern. The latter is by no means a deal-breaker, but it would be nice to see more of the former to properly gauge editing ability. Raylan13 (talk) 17:14, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
Undecided - Generally high quality edits and good edit summaries. Needs to make more new pages of all types (items, mobs, NPCs, guides, etc.). On the road to having the chops to be an admin, but not quite there yet. --Beware the sneaky smile!Fandyllic (talk · contr) 11 Feb 2011 2:08 PM Pacific
Thanks - I'd like to thank you both for the consideration! I'll be devoting more time to edits and page creations. Taurolyon (talk) 20:45, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination failed
Judging by the lack of any updates in two years, i'm going to assume that the nomination has failed. NomNomNomMacrophager(talk) 06:24, March 4, 2013 (UTC)
Support Consistent editor, despite school schedule. Takes direction/suggestions well and remains calm when dealing with other editors. Has expanded types of pages edited after receiving feedback. Might need some direction with new admin tools, but no reservations... despite being Canadian. Raylan13 (talk) 06:46, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
Support Learns quickly, is careful, and asks good questions. He's Canadian!? (hmmm... my dad is Canadian and he seems okay most of the time...) I guess I can live with that. Barring some unforeseen opposition from other users, RyanPT is good admin material. --Beware the sneaky smile!Fandyllic (talk · contr) 31 Jan 2013 5:31 PM Pacific
Nomination confirmed
Congratulations! I'm guessing Raylan and I said all the right things, because no one had anything to add. --Beware the sneaky smile!Fandyllic (talk · contr) 6 Feb 2013 12:36 PM Pacific