Wowpedia:Voting policy

Wowpedia:Policies
Policy status and phases
Category Copyright Deletion – Speedy deletion Disallowed content – NDA Editing – Disruptive editing External links Fan fiction Images		Item articles Lore Naming Neutrality Personal articles Player character pages Projects Stubs Three revert rule User naming Vandalism Voting
See also: guidelines, administrators

This page is an official policy on Wowpedia. This policy has wide acceptance among editors and is considered a standard that all users should follow. Feel free to propose any changes to this policy, but please make sure that changes you make follow the official process and reflect consensus on the discussion page before you put them into practice. Any big changes need to be Adopted or Decreed to be enforced as policy. See Wowpedia:Policies for an overview of Wowpedia policies. See Category:Policies for a list of proposed and adopted policy articles. Shortcut: WW:VOTE

When to vote

There are two main uses of votes on WoWWiki:

• Policy votes
• Deletion votes

In very rare cases votes may be used for other purposes, and this page details this process.

Terminology

• The issue being voted on and action to take are considered a proposal.
• If the Yes votes win (see constraints below), the proposal is considered accepted.
• If the No votes win (see constraints below), the proposal is considered declined.

Voter eligibility

Voters must be registered users with ten previous edits on WoWWiki. Sockpuppetry is forbidden by the user naming policy and if it is determined that a user is a sockpuppet then their vote(s) will be nullified.

The Voting Process

• The issue being voted on should be clearly identified in the discussion page of the article, and a voting booth created. See "How to start a vote", below.
• People now have an opportunity to vote. The {{Vote/Talk}} template explains things for the most part.
• For the decision to be made, the count for the winning side must exceed the losing side by five (5), i.e. 5:0, 6:1, 10:5, etc., and then a waiting period, or vote closing time, of three days must be observed before finally closing the vote and taking the proposed action.
• Votes must last a minimum of a week (seven calendar days) before they can be closed, in conjunction with the above three day waiting period after the last vote. Essentially, if a vote gains enough votes to close in the first day it should still last a week; and if a vote lasts longer than a week the closing duration of three days should still exist between the winning vote being cast and the vote closing.

Results

• Yes wins: Once the vote is closed and the Yes votes have won, the proposer should feel free to take the proposed action as accepted with the trust of most WoWWiki users and backing of the admins.
• No wins: Once the vote is closed and the No votes have won, the proposal is effectively declined.
• With multiple-choice votes the comparison is made to the closest competitor.

Wowpedia:Policies
Policy status and phases
Category Copyright Deletion – Speedy deletion Disallowed content – NDA Editing – Disruptive editing External links Fan fiction Images		Item articles Lore Naming Neutrality Personal articles Player character pages Projects Stubs Three revert rule User naming Vandalism Voting
See also: guidelines, administrators

This page is an official policy on Wowpedia. This policy has wide acceptance among editors and is considered a standard that all users should follow. Feel free to propose any changes to this policy, but please make sure that changes you make follow the official process and reflect consensus on the discussion page before you put them into practice. Any big changes need to be Adopted or Decreed to be enforced as policy. See Wowpedia:Policies for an overview of Wowpedia policies. See Category:Policies for a list of proposed and adopted policy articles. Shortcut: WW:VOTE

When to vote

There are two main uses of votes on WoWWiki:

• Policy votes
• Deletion votes

In very rare cases votes may be used for other purposes, and this page details this process.

Terminology

• The issue being voted on and action to take are considered a proposal.
• If the Yes votes win (see constraints below), the proposal is considered accepted.
• If the No votes win (see constraints below), the proposal is considered declined.

Voter eligibility

Voters must be registered users with ten previous edits on WoWWiki. Sockpuppetry is forbidden by the user naming policy and if it is determined that a user is a sockpuppet then their vote(s) will be nullified.

The Voting Process

• The issue being voted on should be clearly identified in the discussion page of the article, and a voting booth created. See "How to start a vote", below.
• People now have an opportunity to vote. The {{Vote/Talk}} template explains things for the most part.
• For the decision to be made, the count for the winning side must exceed the losing side by five (5), i.e. 5:0, 6:1, 10:5, etc., and then a waiting period, or vote closing time, of three days must be observed before finally closing the vote and taking the proposed action.
• Votes must last a minimum of a week (seven calendar days) before they can be closed, in conjunction with the above three day waiting period after the last vote. Essentially, if a vote gains enough votes to close in the first day it should still last a week; and if a vote lasts longer than a week the closing duration of three days should still exist between the winning vote being cast and the vote closing.

Results

• Yes wins: Once the vote is closed and the Yes votes have won, the proposer should feel free to take the proposed action as accepted with the trust of most WoWWiki users and backing of the admins.
• No wins: Once the vote is closed and the No votes have won, the proposal is effectively declined.
• With multiple-choice votes the comparison is made to the closest competitor.

Voting FAQ

How do we know what to vote on?

See the Votes in progress (category) list.

What really shouldn't be voted on?

Here are some cases:

• Administrative issues: The admins who run WoWWiki can make certain changes in order to keep the site running smoothly. Admins should avoid unilateral decisions, but sometimes they must take matters into their own hands - for example with legal issues.
• Factual accuracy: Although we can dispute what the truth is, you can't really vote on whether it is true. If someone posts something that appears factually accurate, but someone has a reliable or official source that shows that it is not, you can't really vote to keep something untrue in an article. This especailly applies to lore. If Blizzard says this is the lore of World of Warcraft, WoWWiki users shouldn't really vote to keep some lore that disagress with it on the site. That's just silly.
• Terminology: This is sort of a gray area, but usually its best just to put the all the meanings of a commonly used term and indicate which meanings are widely accepted vs. narrowly understood. You can vote on narrowly vs. widely, but unless the meaning attributed to a term is vandalism, totally nonsensical ("frog means an arrow with a rocket on it that speaks many languages") or that only apparently one person has ever heard, its okay to be in the wiki.
• Policy violations: If a page violates policy, the matter really isn't up for vote. If however you do not agree with a policy, you are of course welcome to vote to change the policy!

Why have a vote closed time?

Think of it as a cooling off period and a time for the losing side to campaign for more votes. If the losing side can't drum up enough votes in the time period, it usually indicates they don't care enough or they can't get enough support. We tend to keep the time shorter than we would for policy issues, but the wait time is generally short just because you don't want to be sitting around waiting for no good reason.

What do I do if my side loses, but I still strongly disagree with the outcome?

Propose another vote! We may at some point decide that the result of a vote should "stick" for some time period before allowing another vote, but for now if you want to thrash it out again, you can always do it.

What if the loser just undoes the change of the winning vote?

Well, assuming you followed the proper voting process, you can revert the change back, appeal to an admin to revert the change, or even appeal to an admin to block the user for a time period. Hopefully there will be a policy for violating WoWWiki policy that you can get enforced.

ru:WoWWiki:Правила голосования

Voting FAQ

How do we know what to vote on?

See the Votes in progress (category) list.

What really shouldn't be voted on?

Here are some cases:

• Administrative issues: The admins who run WoWWiki can make certain changes in order to keep the site running smoothly. Admins should avoid unilateral decisions, but sometimes they must take matters into their own hands - for example with legal issues.
• Factual accuracy: Although we can dispute what the truth is, you can't really vote on whether it is true. If someone posts something that appears factually accurate, but someone has a reliable or official source that shows that it is not, you can't really vote to keep something untrue in an article. This especailly applies to lore. If Blizzard says this is the lore of World of Warcraft, WoWWiki users shouldn't really vote to keep some lore that disagress with it on the site. That's just silly.
• Terminology: This is sort of a gray area, but usually its best just to put the all the meanings of a commonly used term and indicate which meanings are widely accepted vs. narrowly understood. You can vote on narrowly vs. widely, but unless the meaning attributed to a term is vandalism, totally nonsensical ("frog means an arrow with a rocket on it that speaks many languages") or that only apparently one person has ever heard, its okay to be in the wiki.
• Policy violations: If a page violates policy, the matter really isn't up for vote. If however you do not agree with a policy, you are of course welcome to vote to change the policy!

Why have a vote closed time?

Think of it as a cooling off period and a time for the losing side to campaign for more votes. If the losing side can't drum up enough votes in the time period, it usually indicates they don't care enough or they can't get enough support. We tend to keep the time shorter than we would for policy issues, but the wait time is generally short just because you don't want to be sitting around waiting for no good reason.

What do I do if my side loses, but I still strongly disagree with the outcome?

Propose another vote! We may at some point decide that the result of a vote should "stick" for some time period before allowing another vote, but for now if you want to thrash it out again, you can always do it.

What if the loser just undoes the change of the winning vote?

Well, assuming you followed the proper voting process, you can revert the change back, appeal to an admin to revert the change, or even appeal to an admin to block the user for a time period. Hopefully there will be a policy for violating WoWWiki policy that you can get enforced.

ru:WoWWiki:Правила голосования