InfinityX89 (talk | contribs) (→Votes) |
Teomyr57033@legacy41576147 (talk | contribs) (→Votes) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<div style="margin: 1em 0em 2em 3em;"> |
<div style="margin: 1em 0em 2em 3em;"> |
||
− | ;< |
+ | ;<span style="color:#44CC44">Keep</span>: <!-- Add: {{vote|Keep|~~ ~~| ...your notes or leave empty... }} (recombine the "~"s)--> |
{{vote|Keep|sig={{User:Gryphon/Sig}} 12:53, 9 April 2007 (EDT)|comment=Though I don't use it, it is a well organized site.}} |
{{vote|Keep|sig={{User:Gryphon/Sig}} 12:53, 9 April 2007 (EDT)|comment=Though I don't use it, it is a well organized site.}} |
||
{{vote|Keep|sig={{User:Vysogota/Sig}} 13:09, 9 April 2007 (EDT)|comment=Probably the best database out there, very useful.}} |
{{vote|Keep|sig={{User:Vysogota/Sig}} 13:09, 9 April 2007 (EDT)|comment=Probably the best database out there, very useful.}} |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
{{vote|Keep|sig={{User:Sky2042/Sig}} 18:19, 9 April 2007 (EDT)||who needs a comment about Wowhead? :)}} |
{{vote|Keep|sig={{User:Sky2042/Sig}} 18:19, 9 April 2007 (EDT)||who needs a comment about Wowhead? :)}} |
||
{{vote|Keep|[[User:InfinityX|InfinityX]] 03:06, 10 April 2007 (EDT)|Wowhead is well-maintained, very reliable, has plenty of easy-to-use filters and categories, and is constantly improving. DEFINITE keep!|}} |
{{vote|Keep|[[User:InfinityX|InfinityX]] 03:06, 10 April 2007 (EDT)|Wowhead is well-maintained, very reliable, has plenty of easy-to-use filters and categories, and is constantly improving. DEFINITE keep!|}} |
||
+ | {{vote|Keep|[[User:Teomyr|Teomyr]] 04:17, 10 April 2007 (EDT)|We all love Wowhead.}} |
||
− | ;< |
+ | ;<span style="color:#CC4444">Remove</span>: <!-- Add: {{vote|Remove|~~ ~~| ...your notes or leave empty... }} (recombine the "~"s)--> |
Revision as of 08:17, 10 April 2007
This is a proposal and requires a vote to be accepted or declined.
|
Changes and Options
This vote will deal with whether we keep Wowhead in the auto-added Elinks templates (Template:Tlink, Template:Tlink, Template:Tlink...). It will be a simple Keep/Remove vote. Manually added Template:Tlink do not count and are always welcome if they fit the policy. The vote is exclusively for the Elinks templates.
A vote is in progress and is PENDING CLOSURE!
|
|
|
Votes
- Keep
- Keep GRYPHONtc 12:53, 9 April 2007 (EDT) - (Though I don't use it, it is a well organized site.)
- Keep Vysogota T / C 13:09, 9 April 2007 (EDT) - (Probably the best database out there, very useful.)
- Keep Dracomage 13:29, 9 April 2007 (EDT) - (Best data source (currently) of the data harvesting websites.)
- Keep User:Tekkub/Sig 14:21, 9 April 2007 (EDT) - (What can I say, I like head...)
- Keep --Reskar 14:27, 9 April 2007 (EDT) - (well organized site not always useful comments but certainly the cleanest and clearest of all the sights)
- Keep Pinky84 14:42, 9 April 2007 (EDT) - (Wowhead is just plain awesome. They should add a Google iframe to their pages so we can browse the web without leaving the comfort of Wowhead.)
- Keep Tribunal 16:38, 9 April 2007 (EDT) - (Fast loading site, great user comments, great screenshots, nice and clean. KEEP THIS!)
- Keep User:Sky2042/Sig 18:19, 9 April 2007 (EDT) - (who needs a comment about Wowhead? :))
- Keep InfinityX 03:06, 10 April 2007 (EDT) - (Wowhead is well-maintained, very reliable, has plenty of easy-to-use filters and categories, and is constantly improving. DEFINITE keep!)
- Keep Teomyr 04:17, 10 April 2007 (EDT) - (We all love Wowhead.)
- Remove