Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
m (→‎Votes: moved incorrectly placed vote)
Line 11: Line 11:
   
 
;<span style="color:#44CC44">Keep</span>: <!-- Add: {{vote|Keep|~~ ~~| ...your notes or leave empty... }} (recombine the "~"s)-->
 
;<span style="color:#44CC44">Keep</span>: <!-- Add: {{vote|Keep|~~ ~~| ...your notes or leave empty... }} (recombine the "~"s)-->
{{vote|Keep|[[User:Pyroshen|Pyroshen]] 17:03, 10 April 2007 (EDT)| I use this more than anything else, best search features, best setup, most up to date and organized. }}
 
 
{{vote|Keep|sig={{User:Gryphon/Sig}} 12:53, 9 April 2007 (EDT)|comment=Though I don't use it, it is a well organized site.}}
 
{{vote|Keep|sig={{User:Gryphon/Sig}} 12:53, 9 April 2007 (EDT)|comment=Though I don't use it, it is a well organized site.}}
 
{{vote|Keep|sig={{User:Vysogota/Sig}} 13:09, 9 April 2007 (EDT)|comment=Probably the best database out there, very useful.}}
 
{{vote|Keep|sig={{User:Vysogota/Sig}} 13:09, 9 April 2007 (EDT)|comment=Probably the best database out there, very useful.}}
Line 29: Line 28:
 
{{vote|Keep|sig={{User:Fizzwidget/Signature}} 15:13, 10 April 2007 (EDT)|comment=not owned by gold sellers, don't accept ads from same, and a great, well-organized DB to boot}}
 
{{vote|Keep|sig={{User:Fizzwidget/Signature}} 15:13, 10 April 2007 (EDT)|comment=not owned by gold sellers, don't accept ads from same, and a great, well-organized DB to boot}}
 
{{vote|Keep|sig={{User:Kirkburn/Sig2}} 16:33, 10 April 2007 (EDT)||Hey, they copied our dark background :P}}
 
{{vote|Keep|sig={{User:Kirkburn/Sig2}} 16:33, 10 April 2007 (EDT)||Hey, they copied our dark background :P}}
 
{{vote|Keep|[[User:Pyroshen|Pyroshen]] 17:03, 10 April 2007 (EDT)| I use this more than anything else, best search features, best setup, most up to date and organized. }}
 
{{vote|Keep|[[User:Rorus Raz|Rorus Raz]] 17:43, 10 April 2007 (EDT)|Clean site, that is well maintained.|}}
 
{{vote|Keep|[[User:Rorus Raz|Rorus Raz]] 17:43, 10 April 2007 (EDT)|Clean site, that is well maintained.|}}
 
{{vote|Keep|[[User:Tachwedd|Tachwedd]] 12:00, 11 April 2007 (EDT)| Likely the future of these kinds of sites, organized, easy to use, most everything you need; still not the be-all-end-all just because it lacks the accumulated info (good and bad) of user comments on older sites}}
 
{{vote|Keep|[[User:Tachwedd|Tachwedd]] 12:00, 11 April 2007 (EDT)| Likely the future of these kinds of sites, organized, easy to use, most everything you need; still not the be-all-end-all just because it lacks the accumulated info (good and bad) of user comments on older sites}}

Revision as of 19:17, 11 April 2007

Changes and Options

This vote will deal with whether we keep Wowhead in the auto-added Elinks templates (Template:Tlink, Template:Tlink, Template:Tlink...). It will be a simple Keep/Remove vote. Manually added Template:Tlink do not count and are always welcome if they fit the policy. The vote is exclusively for the Elinks templates.



Votes

Keep
  1. Keep GRYPHONtc 12:53, 9 April 2007 (EDT) - (Though I don't use it, it is a well organized site.)
  2. Keep Vysogota T / C 13:09, 9 April 2007 (EDT) - (Probably the best database out there, very useful.)
  3. Keep Dracomage 13:29, 9 April 2007 (EDT) - (Best data source (currently) of the data harvesting websites.)
  4. Keep User:Tekkub/Sig 14:21, 9 April 2007 (EDT) - (What can I say, I like head...)
  5. Keep --Reskar 14:27, 9 April 2007 (EDT) - (well organized site not always useful comments but certainly the cleanest and clearest of all the sights)
  6. Keep Pinky84 14:42, 9 April 2007 (EDT) - (Wowhead is just plain awesome. They should add a Google iframe to their pages so we can browse the web without leaving the comfort of Wowhead.)
  7. Keep Tribunal 16:38, 9 April 2007 (EDT) - (Fast loading site, great user comments, great screenshots, nice and clean. KEEP THIS!)
  8. Keep User:Sky2042/Sig 18:19, 9 April 2007 (EDT) - (who needs a comment about Wowhead? :))
  9. Keep InfinityX 03:06, 10 April 2007 (EDT) - (Wowhead is well-maintained, very reliable, has plenty of easy-to-use filters and categories, and is constantly improving. DEFINITE keep!)
  10. Keep Teomyr 04:17, 10 April 2007 (EDT) - (We all love Wowhead.)
  11. Keep User:Adys/Sig 06:26, 10 April 2007 (EDT) - ()
  12. Keep Malus 08:13, 10 April 2007 (EDT) - (Needless to say: The best WoW database around, the interface is nice and simplistic, and easy access to all the information I've ever needed.)
  13. Keep Sharlin 09:00, 10 April 2007 (EDT) - (Simple and currently untarnished by Gold Sellers owning the site)
  14. Keep User:Psyker7/Sig 09:19, 10 April 2007 (EDT) - (Can I kill the person who suggested wowhead be removed??)
  15. Keep Montag 12:03, 10 April 2007 (EDT) - (The only vote I'm really comfortable making; this site is awesome.)
  16. Keep User:Fizzwidget/Signature 15:13, 10 April 2007 (EDT) - (not owned by gold sellers, don't accept ads from same, and a great, well-organized DB to boot)
  17. Keep User:Kirkburn/Sig2 16:33, 10 April 2007 (EDT) - (Hey, they copied our dark background :P)
  18. Keep Pyroshen 17:03, 10 April 2007 (EDT) - (I use this more than anything else, best search features, best setup, most up to date and organized.)
  19. Keep Rorus Raz 17:43, 10 April 2007 (EDT) - (Clean site, that is well maintained.)
  20. Keep Tachwedd 12:00, 11 April 2007 (EDT) - (Likely the future of these kinds of sites, organized, easy to use, most everything you need; still not the be-all-end-all just because it lacks the accumulated info (good and bad) of user comments on older sites)
  21. Keep User:SeiferTim/Sig 12:26, 11 April 2007 (EDT) - (While I would prefer that all three are kept, I definitely want to keep WowHead.)


Remove


Comments

I seriously don't understand the love everyone has for this site. User:Kitan/Sig 12:25, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

/me offers Kitan a glass of Kool-Aid. :D User:Fizzwidget/Signature 15:31, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
I am not sure I understand that either. :) User:Kitan/Sig 16:40, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kool-Aid#.22Drinking_the_Kool-Aid.22 Mikk (T) 12:01, 11 April 2007 (EDT)