Yes

1. Yes AMBER^(RΘCK) 11:59, 20 May 2008 (UTC) - (Originally proposed)
2. Yes User:Gourra/Sig2 12:01, 20 May 2008 (UTC) - (I don't see why not to implement this.)
3. Yes RealmS (talk) 20:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC) - (Seems a good idea)
4. Yes Kirkburn  talk  contr 19:00, 20 May 2008 (UTC) - (A fairly simple extension of the DNP policy)
5. Yes Ose^{Talkz / Contribz} 19:01, 20 May 2008 (UTC) - (sure)
6. Yes k_d³ 19:03, 20 May 2008 (UTC) - (no comment)
7. Yes SWM2448 20:25, 20 May 2008 (UTC) - (Yup)

No

1. No Fisker (talk) 19:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC) - (What alpha?)

I agree fundamentally, but this should take into account images and information garnered from BlizzCon '07, some of which is onwiki and is sometimes mistaken for stuff directly from Wrath. --Sky (t · c · w) 20:50, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

The NDA, and NDA's generally do explicitly mention official information, and now-public information to be outside the scope of the NDA, thus following the NDA still allows us to post from Blizzcon, however i do not think that Blizzcon media itself should be used, unless there's a subtantial reasoning for it. --Fisker (talk)

I'm merely asking for a mention to be included: something like "Information gathered about (game) alpha releases that are added based on information that Blizzard has officially disclosed may be added to the wiki. This includes, but is not limited to, BlizzCon, Blizzcast... (etc etc)". --Sky (t · c · w) 21:35, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Ah, as i find this policy redundant, and somewhat cotradictive i do not really approve of the policy to begin with --Fisker (talk)

Contradictive with what? @sky: How about the bolded paragraph? --k_d³ 21:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

It's contradictive because while we on one hand is breaking an agreement which we agreed to, but on the other hand we're enforcing an agreement we haven't agreed to, we already have a DNP policy about posting unreleased content, i don't know why this doesn't already fall under the same policy --Fisker (talk) 19:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Please check back now. I hope I've been able to take away your concern.AMBER^(RΘCK) 05:44, 27 May 2008 (UTC)