Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
Don't have an account?
Register
Register
Wowpedia
Wowpedia
274,795
pages
in: Votes in progress

Talk: Vandalism policy/Definition2

< Wowpedia talk:Vandalism policy
Back to page
Sign in to edit
(vote almost closed)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
{{vote|Yes|[[User:DarkTichondrias|DarkTichondrias]] 02:48, 14 May 2006 (EDT)}}
  
{{vote|Yes|[[User:DarkTichondrias|DarkTichondrias]] 02:48, 14 May 2006 (EDT)}}
 
{{vote|Yes|[[User:Zsinj|Zsinj]] 17:09, 15 May 2006 (EDT)|I'm suprised this isn't already part of a "including but not limited to" clause}}
  
{{vote|Yes|[[User:Zsinj|Zsinj]] 17:09, 15 May 2006 (EDT)|I'm suprised this isn't already part of a "including but not limited to" clause}}
  +
{{vote|Yes|[[User:Tidywave|Tidywave]] 13:25, 16 May 2006 (EDT)|Attempting to circumvent one of the best tool admins have for abuse control is pretty low.}}
 
'''NOTE:''' This vote has met the ''vote minimum'' (5 votes) and the ''vote ratio'' (at least 3:1 in favor) adn now needs to wait the ''vote closed time'' of 3 days before the proposal gets integrated into the vandalism definition. --[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] 10:39 AM PDT 16 May 2006
  
'''NOTE:''' This vote has met the ''vote minimum'' (5 votes) and the ''vote ratio'' (at least 3:1 in favor) adn now needs to wait the ''vote closed time'' of 3 days before the proposal gets integrated into the vandalism definition. --[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] 10:39 AM PDT 16 May 2006
   

Revision as of 17:25, 16 May 2006

Other comments

Please leave any comment you have about this definition for Vandalism here...

Vote on adding "fake spam cleaners" to definition

Icon-question-48x48 This is a proposal and requires a vote to be accepted or declined.
  • Please vote below after you have reviewed the proposal.
Proposal
  • Add the following to the vandalism definition:
    Pretending to remove other vandalism content in order to prevent cleaning. This includes minor edits or minor removals while leaving a bulk of unwanted content ("spam"), but making a comment as if you removed the unwanted content.
Icon-question-48x48 A vote is in progress!
  • A consensus must be reached by voting before any action is taken.
  • If one side outnumbers the other by five votes for three days, that side is declared the winner.
To vote
Click [Edit] in the upper-right hand corner of the votes section, and add your vote in one the following methods (note that not all votes will have Yes/No options):
  • {{vote|Yes|~~~~|optional comment}}
or
  • {{vote|No|~~~~|optional comment}}
Then click Save page and you are done!
Replace |~~~~| with |sig=~~~~|| if you have a complicated signature!
To discuss the vote
Click [Edit] in the upper-right hand corner of the comments section.
The voting process
See Wowpedia:Voting policy for full details.
Make the following changes based on the outcome:
  • If you are adding the winning vote, or notice that one side is in fact winning:
    1. Change {{Vote/Vote}} on this talk page to {{Vote/Closing}}
  • If Yes has won, and 3 days have passed
    1. Change {{Vote/Closing}} on this talk page to {{Accepted}}
    2. Make the change suggested in the proposal.
  • If No has won, and 3 days have passed
    1. Change {{Vote/Closing}} on this talk page to {{Declined}}
    2. Do not remove the votes!
  • If necessary, you may archive votes to Wowpedia talk:Vandalism policy/Definition2/Archivevote.

Votes

Yes:

  1. Yes Cigawoot 15:13, 17 March 2006 (EST) - (I agree, it's annoying when I've gotta check the "fixes" to make sure they're really fixed.)
  2. Yes Fandyllic 12 AM PST 27 Mar 2006 - (Admins have already defacto made this part of the definition, but might as well make it official.)
  3. Yes TheMaster42 23:54, 5 May 2006 (EDT) - ()
  4. Yes DarkTichondrias 02:48, 14 May 2006 (EDT) - (no comment)
  5. Yes Zsinj 17:09, 15 May 2006 (EDT) - (I'm suprised this isn't already part of a "including but not limited to" clause)
  6. Yes Tidywave 13:25, 16 May 2006 (EDT) - (Attempting to circumvent one of the best tool admins have for abuse control is pretty low.)

NOTE: This vote has met the vote minimum (5 votes) and the vote ratio (at least 3:1 in favor) adn now needs to wait the vote closed time of 3 days before the proposal gets integrated into the vandalism definition. --Fandyllic 10:39 AM PDT 16 May 2006

No:

Comments

  1. Thanks to CJ for noticing this insidious new kind of spam bot, he calls "sneaky bots". --Fandyllic 1:09 PM PST 17 Mar 2006

Vote on initial definition

This vote moved to WoWWiki talk:Vandalism/Votearchive. --Fandyllic

Community content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted.
More Fandoms