m (moved Glowing Nightseye to Timeless Nightseye) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Removed|patch=4.0.1|Replaced by [[Timeless Nightseye]]}} |
||
| − | = Proposed Changes = |
||
| + | {{#data:itemtip |
||
| − | == Proposal to make penalites stricter == |
||
| + | |name=Glowing Nightseye |
||
| − | {{adopted}} |
||
| + | |quality=rare |
||
| − | ;Proposal |
||
| + | |icon=inv_jewelcrafting_nightseye_03 |
||
| − | Change the current blocking table to be more strict: |
||
| + | |gem=Purple |
||
| − | {| style="background-color:#333333;" |
||
| + | |gemattrib=+5 Intellect and +6 Stamina |
||
| − | |- |
||
| + | |ilvl=70 |
||
| − | | valign="top" | |
||
| + | |sellprice=30000 |
||
| − | {| style="color:#aaaaaa; margin-left:20px; padding:6px 6px 6px 6px;" |
||
| + | |itemid=24056}} |
||
| − | |- |
||
| + | '''Glowing Nightseye''' is a [[socket]]ed [[gem]] crafted by [[Jewelcrafting]]. It requires a minimum skill of 350 and a [[Simple Grinder]]. |
||
| − | || Original: |
||
| − | |- |
||
| − | ! style="border-bottom:1px solid white; padding:0px 6px 6px 0px;" |# of Acts Vandalism |
||
| − | ! style="border-bottom:1px solid white; padding:0px 6px 6px 0px;" |Block Time |
||
| − | |- align="center" |
||
| − | ||5 acts||7 days (168 hours) |
||
| − | |- align="center" |
||
| − | ||20 acts||1 month |
||
| − | |- align="center" |
||
| − | ||50 acts||1 year |
||
| − | |- align="center" |
||
| − | ||100 acts ||10 years |
||
| − | |} |
||
| − | | style="background-color:#333333; width:20px;" | |
||
| − | | valign="top" | |
||
| − | {| style="margin-left:20px; padding:6px 6px 6px 6px;" |
||
| − | |- |
||
| − | || Proposed: |
||
| − | |- |
||
| − | ! style="border-bottom:1px solid white; padding:0px 6px 6px 0px;" |# of Acts Vandalism |
||
| − | ! style="border-bottom:1px solid white; padding:0px 6px 6px 0px;" |Block Time |
||
| − | |- align="center" valign="top" |
||
| − | ||1 act||7 days (168 hours) |
||
| − | |- align="center" valign="top" |
||
| − | ||5 acts||1 month |
||
| − | |- align="center" valign="top" |
||
| − | ||10 acts||1 year |
||
| − | |- align="center" valign="top" |
||
| − | ||20 acts<br><font style="font-size:x-small;">or more</font>||10 years |
||
| − | |} |
||
| − | |} |
||
| + | ; Materials required: |
||
| − | {{Vote/Vote}} |
||
| + | :1x [[Nightseye]] |
||
| − | ===Votes=== |
||
| − | <!-- Vote below this line, after all other previously cast votes --> |
||
| − | ====<font color="#44CC44">'''Yes:'''</font>==== |
||
| − | {{vote|Yes|[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] 7:18 PM PST 15 Feb 2006|See below}} |
||
| − | {{vote|Yes|[[User:D. F. Schmidt|Schmidt]] 20:12, 8 Mar 2006 (EST)|}} |
||
| − | {{vote|Yes|[[User:Stfrn|Stfrn]] 15:28, 9 Mar 2006 (EST)|always more spammers, need to be tough on them}} |
||
| − | {{vote|Yes|[[User:CrazyJack|CJ]] 04:46, 10 Mar 2006 (EST)|more permanent blocks needed as well}} |
||
| − | {{vote|Yes|[[User:Sergius|Sergius]] 13:57, 10 Mar 2006 (GMT+3)|I think 3+ acts should be punished by permanent ban.}} |
||
| − | '''NOTE:''' This proposal vote has now met the ''ratification minimum'' (at least 5 Yes votes) and the ''ratification ratio'' (5:0 in favor), so is ''ratified''. It needs to wait the ''ratification time'' of 7 days from now to become ''adopted'' as policy. --[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] 12:54 PM PST 10 Mar 2006 |
||
| − | '''ADOPTED:''' This proposal has been ''adopted'' as policy and will be integrated into the full [[WoWWiki:Policy/Vandalism|Vandalism policy]] after waiting the required ''rarification time''. --[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] 1:14 PM PST 17 Mar 2006 |
||
| + | The recipe for this item is taught by [[Design: Glowing Nightseye]], an [[outland]] [[world drop]]. |
||
| − | ====<font color="#CC4444">'''No:'''</font>==== |
||
| − | == |
+ | ==External links== |
| + | <!-- Read http://www.wowpedia.org/Wowpedia:External_links before posting your links here. |
||
| − | # Spam is annoying me, so here's a way to get tougher on spammers and vandals. --[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] 7:16 PM PST 15 Feb 2006 |
||
| + | Links that do not conform to the rules will be DELETED. |
||
| − | # Cool the votes picked up. If the othe radmins agree, I think we should start enforcing these new stricter rules immediately. --[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] 12:56 PM PST 10 Mar 2006 |
||
| + | Repeat violations may result in a BAN. |
||
| − | # I don't mind at all, but the fact is that essentially, the only problems we've been having with vandalism is bots. So the change is more or less irrelevant right now. However, if fewer bots appear with the patch that will be coming soon, and everything that comes with it, well, I think this policy will be better than the old one. [[User:D. F. Schmidt|Schmidt]] 03:31, 12 Mar 2006 (EST) |
||
| + | Have a nice day. :) --> |
||
| − | |||
| + | {{Elinks-item|24056}} |
||
| − | = Proposal and Vote Archives = |
||
| − | The initial policy was adopted around 8 Feb 2006. See [[WoWWiki talk:Policy/Vandalism/Adoption1]] for the vote. |
||
| − | |||
| − | == Implementation Details == |
||
| − | Was mostly being done already. When the policy was ''ratified'', I started enforcing blocks on mostly spammer vandals. |
||
| − | |||
| − | Anyone can help out by adding any vandals to the [[WoWWiki:Known vandals|known vandals list]]. |
||
| − | :--[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] 2:40 PM PST 16 Feb 2006 |
||
| − | |||
| − | Are vandals blocked by IP, or just by account name ? it seems that some bots just randomly pick names and keep at it... account creation should require an email verification. or some kind of anti automation security image... anything really. [[User:CrazyJack|CJ]] 04:47, 10 Mar 2006 (EST) |
||
| − | |||
| − | = Old Discussion = |
||
| − | Not sure if this is where we can start our discussion on definition of a Vandal? But here goes: |
||
| − | * Definition of a Vandal - repeated acts of edits making non-sense, errors and blatant advertisements (1 pixel ads) admissions. |
||
| − | |||
| − | --[[User:Dracomage|Dracomage]] 16:13, 7 Dec 2005 (EST) |
||
| − | |||
| − | :Ahhah! The definition of a vandal! Fits me perfectly, that's why I am on the [[WoWWiki:Known vandals|known vandals]] list of course! WTF am I on there... I have done nothing but further this community, I vene *created* this page! |
||
| − | ::[[User:SilverSide| ]]<sub>[[User:SilverSide|ℑilver]]</sub>[[User:SilverSide|§]]<sup>[[User talk:SilverSide|ℑide</sup>]] 16:31, 7 Dec 2005 (EST) |
||
| − | |||
| − | :P.S. That sounds good - I would also add something about the three revert rule, and multiple violations (1 viol, they get warned on the talk page in a nice manner, 2 viol., they are warned again in a stern *very clear* manner just incase it didn't get across the first time, 3 viol. they are added to the [[WoWWiki:Known vandals]], and 4 viol. they are banned by IP), and something about sheer quantity of edits too... |
||
| − | |||
| − | ::I think K-Bot edits should automatically warrant a ban. Period. Definition of K-Bot ban? edits starting with < div id="wikiNUMBER" style="overflow:auto; height: 1px; " > where number is any number, and containing links like [ http://push.d2g.biz/cialis/ generic cialis ] - anybody agree? |
||
| − | :::--[[User:SilverSide| ]]<sub>[[User:SilverSide|ℑilver]]</sub>[[User:SilverSide|§]]<sup>[[User talk:SilverSide|ℑide</sup>]] 13:24, 5 Jan 2006 |
||
| − | |||
| − | :::The policy is written in such a way that these bots should get banned pretty quickly, but we could put a much lower threshold for bots that are obviously bots. Maybe after 5 changes? I'm not sure we should special case too much. |
||
| − | ::::--[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] 7:11 PM PST 9 Jan 2006 |
||
Revision as of 00:08, 29 March 2011
 |
The subject of this article was removed from World of Warcraft in patch 4.0.1.
|
- Glowing Nightseye
- +5 Intellect and +6 Stamina
- "Matches any socket."
- Sell Price: 3
Glowing Nightseye is a socketed gem crafted by Jewelcrafting. It requires a minimum skill of 350 and a 
[Simple Grinder].
- Materials required
- 1x
[Nightseye]
The recipe for this item is taught by Design: Glowing Nightseye, an outland world drop.