Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
(fixed spacing)
 
(Created page with "==Bias?== Just gotta say, the text seems to be very obviously biased towards "OMG THIS IS AWESOME" :P ~~~~")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
==Bias?==
{{npcbox
 
  +
Just gotta say, the text seems to be very obviously biased towards "OMG THIS IS AWESOME" :P [[User:Drunkenvalley|Drunkenvalley]] ([[User talk:Drunkenvalley|talk]]) 16:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
| image = Dragon nopic.jpg
 
| name = Zarasz
 
| gender = Male
 
| race = Dragon
 
| affiliation = [[Red Dragonflight]]
 
| occupation = Former slave of the Dragonmaw Clan
 
| status = Alive}}
 
 
{{Novel}}
 
The [[red dragon]] '''Zarasz''' was a slave of the orcs during the [[Dragonmaw Clan|Dragonmaw Clan's]] occupation of the mountain fortress of [[Grim Batol]]. The aged orc Warlock [[Nekros Skullcrusher]] used the [[Demon Soul]] to take control over [[Alexstrasza]] and most of the Red Flight, to be used as mounts and slaves for the orcish Horde. Zarasz's wings had developed malformed, so cursed with the inability to fly he was used to patrol the underground caverns of Grim Batol, keeping out unwanted intruders.
 
 
After the Horde's defeat in the [[Second War]], [[Vereesa Windrunner]] was searching for her lost comrade [[Rhonin]], whom had been sent to Grim Batol by the Dragon-Mage [[Korialstrasz]] in an attempt to free his queen. Along with the gryphon rider [[Falstad Wildhammer]], she managed to sneak into Grim Batol but not without encountering Zarasz and his orcish handler. Korialstrasz spoke with Zarasz via a magic talisman Vereesa Windrunner had thrown into his mouth, and Korialstrasz convinced the other [[Dragon]] to stand down and allow the duo to pass. Once the ranger the gryphon rider had dispatched the orc, Zarasz returned the talisman to Vereesa and the pair continued on.{{Cite|DotD|296-301}}
 
 
 
{{Red Dragonflight}}
 
{{dragonkin}}
 
 
[[Category:Lore characters]]
 
[[Category:Dragons]]
 
[[Category:Red Dragonflight]]
 

Revision as of 16:29, 28 October 2010

Bias?

Just gotta say, the text seems to be very obviously biased towards "OMG THIS IS AWESOME" :P Drunkenvalley (talk) 16:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)