User talk:Amberrock/Archive01

From WoWWiki

Revision as of 08:18, February 17, 2008

Thanks for cleaning vandalism

Your efforts are appreciated. --Fandyllic (talk) 10 PM PST 10 Dec 2006

Pictures

Cinematic images or drawn images are preferred if they are superior to the WoW screenshot. Especially so in the case of Garona who is not actually in WoW. --Ragestorm 16:35, 21 December 2006 (EST)

Welcome to WoWWiki!

Hello, Amberrock, and welcome to WoWWiki, the Warcraft wiki! Thank you for your contributions, and we heartily encourage you to continue contributing! Some links you may find useful: The things to do category has lots of things to keep you busy! Check out the Community portal for some useful editors' links. Note that WoWWiki isn't an absolute democracy, but many decisions are voted on. See a list of votes in progress. Many WoWWikians frequent our IRC Channel, on chat.freenode.net, #wowwiki. Finally, please check out the site guidelines and policies! We hope you enjoy editing here and being a WoWWikian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) as this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, just ask on the relevant talk page, or visit the WoWWiki Forums.

Again, welcome!   --Fandyllic (talk) 5:32 PM PST 22 Dec 2006

Moved comment

Hey there, not sure if im doing anything right. I added a page to describe my guild but then its not there so i added it again but its gone again. Would you be able to help me out? I didnt want to create mess.

thanks

pete -- Nozzub

New Signature

Honestly, us in IRC were inspired by your signature. We were talking about the ability to upgrade signatures (which I was never acquainted with), and I modelled mine after yours. By the way, what's up with the blood elf? Haha. Lookin' good. Happy Almost! --Hobinheim (talk · contr) 17:48, 31 December 2006 (EST)

Grammar Fixes

Thanks for fixing some of my horrible, 3am grammar on the Instance Attunement page :-P

Remmiz 20:46, 31 December 2006 (EST)

Reply: Yeah, hehe still getting used to this whole 'wiki' thing. Never been too much of a fan until now :)

Remmiz 06:55, 1 January 2007 (EST)

IRC pic

Can you use another logo for the IRC thing maybe? I think it's a bad idea to use the mIRC one due to copyright and also because I don't really want us to promote one program :P Perhaps use a cool "IRC" typeface? --  Kirkburn talk contr 20:45, 2 January 2007 (EST)

The silly purge

You'll need to change the text of Category:Silly too. As it currently reads, Dupe Bugs should be categorized there. --Beep2 11:18, 7 January 2007 (EST)

My Bad

I didn't think about your reading of it. ^_^ It was late n' such. But yea. I think I figured out where to put it. And thanks for your input. :) -Kwertz0r 09:20, 11 January 2007 (EST)

Hehe, I'm feeling really nooby right about now. Thanks again for your tips on etiquitte. -Kwertz0r 10:54, 11 January 2007 (EST)

Main Page Featured Article!

I thought you might be interested to see WoWWiki:Main Page Dev, and the start of the WW:FA project. Kirkburn talk contr 20:53, 28 March 2007 (EDT)

official, canon, etc

We intentionally removed the term "canon" on previous occasions because its a dangerous term used by the fans, but not used at all by powers that be at Blizzard (at least no one has given any specific quotes). That is Blizzard as far as we are awhare seem to use "lore" in place of the term canon, official, and other such terminology (perhaps because it allows for more flexibility to allow for stories that may or may not be in contradiction with each other but can be part of the same pantheon of "lore" material). For example, both accounts of lothar's death existing as common knowledge to the people of Azeroth, or concept that there is more than one creation legend, etc etc.

The danger of use of the term "canon" is people tend to throw it around like a weapon, each with their own wild views on what they believe as canon, instead of taking a wider picture that according to lore that there may be multiple "in-universe" interpretations.

I'm not opposed to you adding canon again, as long as you clean it up, and explain its signifigance as a fan construct, in relation to the Blizzard's use of the term "lore" instead, and dangers of trying to toss opinions "canon" around, "to win debates".Baggins 10:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Death Knight lore

This is where I would get evil on you and attack about you undermining my authority. But since it would have been done anyway, I'll just skip to the part where I thank you for your foresight and ask for your continued vigilance. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 18:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

local copy of Image:Crusadeheader.jpg?

Do you have a local copy somewhere? I don't want to delete that little piece of work yet if you don't have a copy saved on your harddrive or on an external site. --Sky (talk | con | wh) 08:35, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Ready to try a rename?

Just reply here when you want me to try to rename your user from Apollozeus to Amberrock. -- Fandyllic (talk · contr) 1:58 PM PST 14 Jan 2008

I'm ready! *Tightens seatbelt* AMBER^(RΘCK) 22:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Presto! Now you gotta fix your sig. -- Fandyllic (talk · contr) 2:35 PM PST 14 Jan 2008

You might also want to create wikia:User:Amberrock at wikia.com to make sure no one takes it. -- Fandyllic (talk · contr) 2:38 PM PST 14 Jan 2008

Map of the Sunwell Isle

The info looks pretty good, but where did it come from? Is there some secret pre-test test that we don't know about? As far as I'm aware, the test servers aren't even up yet. --Joshmaul 19:02, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Watchdog

As a fairly veteran member of the site, I wondered if you wanted to become a Watchdog? Indeed I was kinda surprised to find you aren't already! Kirkburn  talk  contr 08:18, 17 February 2008 (UTC)